Well rather OP is pointing out that there is a third option that both parties nay consider to be a fair compromise, and thus be more likely to agree to.
It does if one of the options leads to a successful compromise. Based on the comments on this post, it seems that this solution has worked for a lot of households
My point is, the entire problem is agreeing to one option in the first place. Which option you pick is irrelevant.
Well rather OP is pointing out that there is a third option that both parties nay consider to be a fair compromise, and thus be more likely to agree to.
It doesn’t matter if there are 2 or 20 options.
But one option is hygienic, the other two are convenience. Fuck convenience, put the lid down and wash your hands, it’s for everyone’s sake
It does if one of the options leads to a successful compromise. Based on the comments on this post, it seems that this solution has worked for a lot of households
Sure, whatever … not the point.
?