• Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I wouldn’t quite agree. Sure, a car can be used as a weapon, but that’s not its primary function. I’m not aware of the exact case, but if prison rehabilitated him in a way that he no longer uses a car as a weapon, and that’s his only driving-related offense, I really see no reason why he shouldn’t get a driving license. Unfortunate as it may be, not being able to have a car is a severe disadvantage in a lot of areas.

    I would agree with you if it was about a gun license. Having a gun is only useful as a weapon.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I don’t know about England, but at least here in Denmark, many people who have served a sentence will get into a trade. Without a drivers license those jobs can be practically impossible to keep.

    • Bonifratz@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It seems only logical to me that if we have tests for people to earn the right to drive a car, then there should also be a possibility of forfeiting that right again.

      I sort of get the gun argument but it’s not airtight in my opinion. Guns too can be used in harmless ways (shooting as a sport) so by the same logic full rehabilitation would include getting a gun license back.

      And sure not having a car can be a big disadvantage, but so is having a criminal record, and we don’t stop jailing people because of that. Rehabilitation doesn’t mean that all consequences of your crime are undone.

      • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        At least in my country, no one can know about your criminal record, so it’s not a disadvantage. And it shouldn’t be.