• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Genuinely I would love to understand your perspective - how are they not a religious practice?

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m not sure how the presence of ideas promoted by Jung or the concept of guided self-reflection are at all mutually exclusive with religious beliefs.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              They’re not, they’re distinct concepts that are commonly found expressed in religious practices but are not in of themselves spiritual. I’m sorry I’m genuinely confused as to what you’re saying.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  So your assertion is that I should understand that it’s not a religious practice because… it shares traits with many religious and nonreligious practices.

                  I’m sorry, I don’t think in this case that the confusion is due to a fault on my part :/

                  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    You literally said:

                    They’re not, they’re distinct concepts that are commonly found expressed in religious practices but are not in of themselves spiritual.

                    You acknowledged that Jungian archetypes are distinct concepts from religious practices and not in themselves spiritual. And yet you don’t understand why some people are saying “Tarot isn’t necessarily religious or spiritual”?

                    You say “it shares traits with many religious a nonreligious practices” as if you think that’s definitively concludes that it’s inherently religious.

                    And yet you openly avow satanism and write yourself a pass because it’s “secular” and you completely ignore the fact that by your same argument against tarot, i.e. that it “shares traits with many religious and nonreligious practices,” you would have to consider your own beliefs and practices under the same umbrella.

                    The confusion is definitely due to a fault on your part. No one else here is confused.

              • Maeve@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                I’m saying you’re way too attached to this and it may be worth exploring, in your own time. This is like if someone latched on to your SN and assume you’re into the dark arts and Loki is your patron.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  I was attempting to explore this by engaging with the person who made the assertion directly when you engaged with me, though. If you don’t want to be here, you’re welcome to leave? Alternatively I welcome an explanation instead of a fairly rude dismissal.

                  (Also I am an open satanist - their conclusion would not be incorrect, which is in part why I chose this username)

                  • Maeve@kbin.earth
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    I get it. Your literal magical practice > anyone else’s, real or jest.