Hmm the article doesn’t actually say they’re rooting for it to collapse, it just says they don’t mind if it collapses

So killing civilians helps?

One path requires a break from capitalism through a mass revolution and the other doesn’t

Then? More people have the incentive to break from this than not

Oil is only profitable for the people producing oil, which is not most people

Renewables+nuclear is cheaper and in a truly free market would beat out oil

We stop the oil propaganda. Without that, we do gradually stop using oil, because the alternatives are

• cheaper
• easier to obtain
• do not need dependency on Russia/middle east, which are both politically toxic

Setting up an unofficial mirror is an option

why use this over the hundreds of messaging platforms that can be self hosted and have e2ee

Cool. I’m getting off it so that they don’t think doing shit like this is okay

A democracy ideally should have checks against buying voters, not that these are effective maybe anywhere in the world, but I would hate to be a doomer and think this is something that can’t be fixed.

He probably thinks it isn’t real, rather than “it is not affecting me right now, but will probably be unmanageable in 20 years”

Can they be sued for this?

Doesn’t work with libraries. Though this guy’s rant is pretty silly

nah, training data is not why it answered this (otherwise it would have training data from many different years, way more than of 2025)

Explain please

I’m not an accountant but here’s how that might go

• institute a family fund to hold all of your assets for you, registered in tax haven

• don’t actually own part of the fund, so that it doesn’t count as an asset, but find a wag to keep control of it

I’d love a wealth tax but stashing your wealth in tax havens is super easy so idk what the point is

you could say this about anyone though. like “there are some people with cancer I’d want to be in jail”

just because someone is homeless doesn’t mean they’re more likely to be a bad person

Sam Altman is fuckin gay?