

I’m curious what you identify as poorly made—I’m not a psychology researcher, but their methodology and statistical analysis seem basically credible.
I’m curious what you identify as poorly made—I’m not a psychology researcher, but their methodology and statistical analysis seem basically credible.
It’s just one study, but there is science to back that up
I never said it was only semantically different, only that you were making a semantic argument: namely, citing the semantic distinction between copying and stealing as grounds for one being acceptable and the other not (“stealing” is wrong but I’m “copying”), ignoring that the injustice against the work’s creator is not pragmatically different. Practically speaking, the author is equally robbed whether you “copy” or “steal”; therefore, arguing that copying is not stealing obscures the heart of the matter behind a semantic distinction.
That’s a semantic point. The truth is that artists deserve to be paid for their work. Whether you “copy” or “steal”, you’re getting the work without paying the creator. That’s fundamentally shitty behavior.
Cool, you hate creatives and feel entitled to their work on the basis of semantics
In case anybody’s curious, buses are generally much wider than cars (my local buses are 8’6”, compared to the 6’6” Honda Odyssey); their seats are also narrower and the walls thinner, which adds up to a lot of interior space.
Yeah, this guy is either trolling or doesn’t have the faintest clue what a good education actually comprises.
Yes, wholeheartedly. They’re not cheating the school—they’re cheating themselves. If you’re paying 200k+ for an education, for what earthly reason would you then skip the actual education?
Lucky you, it’s all over my company.
Bio break.
I don’t think I have to elaborate on that one.
It’s in the name: liability. If the instance gets sued, only the LLC’s assets can be claimed.
There may be other reasons that OP has in mind, but that’s the most obvious benefit I see.
It’s a form of malware that exponentially burns through resources. The classic example is using the Unix fork
command, which spawns a new process. You then program it so each process spawns several child processes, each of which spawn children of their own, and so on until the computer runs out of compute resources and freezes up entirely.
In this case, the idea is to have the LLM query LLMs in the same recursive manner, burning query tokens almost as fast as OpenAI burns venture capital.
Not strictly cooling the apartment, but I keep a large supply of ice cold water ready to drink whenever I start to get too warm—if you can effectively cool yourself throughout the day, it raises the maximum comfortable temperature of the apartment as a whole, and it’s usually easier to cool a single body than a large volume of air.
This may come off as rude, but I ask out of genuine curiosity: why would you think this is a good idea?
Professional athletes also have some of the strongest unions in the country, since they’re a small group of practically irreplaceable workers, and many of the league structures are the result of collective bargaining between players and owners.
It’s FOSS and decentralized/supports self hosting, plus has a large following in fediverse circles so it gets colloquially lumped in
I would implement two salary rules for baseball: