• bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Yes, but Facebook can’t just place that script on other people’s pages.

    That’s the point of the buttons. Website designers place that shit themselves.

    • bjorney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      The buttons don’t do any tracking just from existing. They only exist to encourage a miniscule number of people to repost your content on social media, and in the event a share comes from that, they may include affiliate info

      All the useful information comes from the tracking scripts, which developers are also placing themselves because they are infinitely more useful. They tell you where visitors are coming from, how/if they are converting, everything they are viewing/interacting with on your site, and what the ROI of your ad spend is. In addition to telling you if someone clicked the share button.

      Tracking pixels have been decoupled from the “share” buttons for at least 10-15 years

      • sep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I hear you say that. But umatrix consistently show facebook twitter google and friends failing to load on the majority of pages i visit. Is that something else?

        • bjorney@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s Google analytics, and the meta/twitter/etc tracking pixels. Almost every site uses them because they provide useful data to the site owner and they are free.

          the images in OPs post appear to be designed to match their site theme, meaning umatrix wouldn’t even block them, because they are being served from the sites actual domain/CDN and not from Facebook/Google’s tracking domain.