1 and 2 can be done by human, or at least by industrial processses that have nowt to do with AI. Knowledgeless fabrication describes most of my woodworking projects, and definately any welding I’ve ever do, though in that case it ends with Excrement.
3,4,5 are no where near disparaging enough. It states 5 is “super harsh” wtf.
I much prefer OPs but there are some criticisms here around rendered, and i think it shuld be more general than pictures, so I’d go for something like:
Computer Regurgitated Artificial Plagiarism
And yes that does include scanning the mona lisa and printing it out, still crap.
Or you can do a GNU or LAME style Russian-doll acronym - this sort of covers self reinforcing hallucination/feedback type stuff.
Although I have to say that’s the CRAP that provides the most entertainment.
The part of your comment where you thought for yourself is a good point. OP’s definition conflates digital human-crafted media with impersonal slop spat out without care.
Is Toy Story C.R.A.P?
Your acronym sucks.
Here’s ChatGPT’s suggestions, they’re much better than your human attempt.
F.A.K.E. – Fabricated Aesthetic, Knowledgeless Expression (Emphasizes lack of real understanding or human touch.)
S.H.A.M. – Synthetic Heuristic Art Mimicry (Suggests it’s a cheap imitation of real creativity.)
B.L.A.N.D. – Bot-Led Art with No Depth (Points to emotional or conceptual flatness.)
G.H.O.S.T. – Generated Hologram Of Soulless Technique (Invokes an eerie emptiness—art without a soul.)
D.R.A.I.N. – Digitally Rendered Art Is Nothing (Super harsh—perfect if you’re going for a scorched-earth critique.)
1 and 2 can be done by human, or at least by industrial processses that have nowt to do with AI. Knowledgeless fabrication describes most of my woodworking projects, and definately any welding I’ve ever do, though in that case it ends with Excrement.
3,4,5 are no where near disparaging enough. It states 5 is “super harsh” wtf.
I much prefer OPs but there are some criticisms here around rendered, and i think it shuld be more general than pictures, so I’d go for something like:
Computer Regurgitated Artificial Plagiarism
And yes that does include scanning the mona lisa and printing it out, still crap.
Or you can do a GNU or LAME style Russian-doll acronym - this sort of covers self reinforcing hallucination/feedback type stuff. Although I have to say that’s the CRAP that provides the most entertainment.
CRAP Regurgitated (by) Artificial Plagiarism
This one is much better.
The part of your comment where you thought for yourself is a good point. OP’s definition conflates digital human-crafted media with impersonal slop spat out without care.