Sam Altman doesn't seem that concerned about copyright infringement, but says it's 'very screwed up' that OpenAI is legally required to retain chats, which could include 'your most sensitive stuff.'
And how would they prove that what you said was truthful, and not just fucking around with ChatGPT?
Also, wouldn’t this be easy to poison? Have a script randomly ask ChatGPT wholesome things all day… and then your defence lawyer can use that to bolster your character in court, no?
They don’t have to prove anything; If you killed somebody and happened to ask ChatGPT how to hide a body they are going to use that as evidence that you did the killing and that the murder was premeditated. You could argue that you were fucking around or that it was somebody using your account or that it was one weird question in a string of wholesome ones and maybe the jury will believe you and maybe they won’t.
And how would they prove that what you said was truthful, and not just fucking around with ChatGPT?
Also, wouldn’t this be easy to poison? Have a script randomly ask ChatGPT wholesome things all day… and then your defence lawyer can use that to bolster your character in court, no?
They don’t have to prove anything; If you killed somebody and happened to ask ChatGPT how to hide a body they are going to use that as evidence that you did the killing and that the murder was premeditated. You could argue that you were fucking around or that it was somebody using your account or that it was one weird question in a string of wholesome ones and maybe the jury will believe you and maybe they won’t.