If you had the money to retire at 30, your savings would be invested and on an average year your earnings would cover your expenses. You would have health insurance, so no worries there. The only catch is that you would have to keep your expenses at 65% of what you spend right now. Would you take it, or would you rather work a few more years for a better lifestyle and financial security?

  • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    A 4% withdrawal rate is intended for a 30yr retirement when accounting for inflation, so you’d need to keep your expenses well below that, probably closer to 2%. But more importantly in my opinion this relies on the assumption of a mostly stable market, which over the course of a ~70yr retirement is riskier a bet to take compared to a ~30yr retirement.

    Also what would you do on such a tight budget for ~70yr that you wouldn’t get bored of?

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Absolutely but after a while you’d likely run out of cheap hobbies and need more money than your 2% to fund it. The better way to do it is taking a year or two off in the middle of your career imo.