• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, it is a duck? Anyone? (/s)

    No but seriously, i think the question of personhood is interesting and more complicated, at least in theory. Like, what if we ever meet an extraterrestrial species that also exhibits intelligent behavior. Would we consider them natural persons? Would we grant personhood to them? Why, or why not?

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Bro if extraterrestrials visit Earth. The more important question will be whether **they grant humans personhood! **

        • chetradley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Unfortunately probably not. It’s an interesting philosophical question. What is the metric by which we grant personhood and by extension negative rights (life, liberty, autonomy) to a being?

          It can’t be intellect, because that would exclude edge case humans with cognitive impairments.

          I think sentience is a good metric, but most disagree because the logical conclusion is that we should extend these rights to animals.

          If it’s just the fact that we’re human, then this would automatically exclude sentient AI and the above referenced alien species.