Thanks. You explained the misunderstanding in my comment that the comment you’re replying to missed.
I missed this misunderstanding and went off on an unhinged rant I deleted. Should have recognized that they were talking about images and I was referring to the context you referred to.
Calling an AI “she” is giving a different degree of humanity than what we refer to with “her” when talking about the artist portrayal of a woman.
It’s like calling the algorithm that generated a picture of a women “she” vs. calling the women IN the image “she”.
I missed this misunderstanding and you clarified it perfectly.
Thanks. You explained the misunderstanding in my comment that the comment you’re replying to missed.
I missed this misunderstanding and went off on an unhinged rant I deleted. Should have recognized that they were talking about images and I was referring to the context you referred to.
Calling an AI “she” is giving a different degree of humanity than what we refer to with “her” when talking about the artist portrayal of a woman.
It’s like calling the algorithm that generated a picture of a women “she” vs. calling the women IN the image “she”.
I missed this misunderstanding and you clarified it perfectly.