“Your honor, I was not being influenced by the drink I had. It did not say or act in any way such that my behavior would change. Secondly, I was not driving while intoxicated. Intoxicated as defined by the dictionary literally says ‘stupefied by alcohol.’ that cannot have happened because at no point was I stupid.”
Sometimes they do, but I wouldn’t try that method. I have been complimented by three different judges for properly parsing and answering their conflicting questions.
deleted by creator
“I wasn’t influenced by the booze. It was my own choice.”
Defendant: Nuh, uh. Everyone knows it’s called “DWI”—driving while intoxicated—which doesn’t really help me either, does it?
“Your honor, I was not being influenced by the drink I had. It did not say or act in any way such that my behavior would change. Secondly, I was not driving while intoxicated. Intoxicated as defined by the dictionary literally says ‘stupefied by alcohol.’ that cannot have happened because at no point was I stupid.”
Judges LOVE smartasses.
Eh my assumption is that this woman doesn’t realize she’s being a smart ass to begin with.
Sometimes they do, but I wouldn’t try that method. I have been complimented by three different judges for properly parsing and answering their conflicting questions.
Curses! Foiled again!
“Checkmate, I injected it!!”
I accidentally sat down on the bottle and shot it up my butt and GOOD DAY I SAID GOOD DAY.
*sigh *, it includes intravenous drugs.
I will not stop until I find some bullshit loophole.
Most places also have open container laws.
USA and even Anglosphere is not “most places”.
Are there a lot of countries that allow open alcohol containers in vehicles?
Most of legal systems try to stay logical…