cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/37665245
You can also flag the ai images in the result.
Perfect solution? Not even close. Still…
-
Now what would be interesting to hear is that they’re using AI to find the photos.
I think that the “Fuck” in “Fuck AI” stand for “Fuck the misuse caused by shitty company”. If Duck Duck use it to filter off some slot, fine. As said in the post, users can flag them too. It’s not a silver bullet, but better than nothing.
I too find that theres positions and positions in relation to what “fuck ai” means as a instance of antagonism that spectrum-like goes from more ethical and aesthecally incline regarding predatory use to abscence of intentionality in art to the other extreme of ontological repulse
i have learn english by reading old books. I have never met an angophone so Im kind aware that i tend to sound weirdly formal, especially since the books ive read happen to be quite old.
But ever since covid i discovered warhammer and horus heresy so thats my two cents of updates on modern eglish
Hey, works for me mate. I’ll take ‘elaborate and poetic’ writing over ‘AI slop’ every day of the week - it’s a great match for all the gothic writing style in 40K as well.
I’m honestly flattered, if that was the intent. This type of affirmative helps a lot with my insecurities regarding English proficiency. The first reason to come to Lemmy in the first place was as a dare to engage with it. Thank you
👌 No hay problema.
Sorry, i dont understand
Немає проблем
Que?
wot
It should be opt-in tho instead of opt-out
oof, if only all ai were opt in instead of opt out…
Too bad it’s probably not going to take a whole lot longer to get to the point where it’s virtually impossible to tell. It’s already difficult for many of us.
I’m hoping there’ll be more indicators within the metadata of an image or video. If not the AI putting in AI copyright data or something, at least some tells from human made content like phone model or GPS data-- stuff that tends to get removed or hidden can at least verify to the service hosting the image that it’s legit.
Doesn’t stop someone who really wants to fake it from falsifying that data but it certainly would help trim the ones who are just trying to profit off cheap, mass produced content.
Of course, those will be the ones doing the most damage.
Yeah, but at least for an image filter it’ll help. Giving bad actors, like bots, more fodder is obviously not a good thing, although they were pretty effective even pre-AI.
It is so weird to me that even stock image sites lean so much into that. If web search becomes unusable it would actually be worth it to go to these sites to get some human made ones. (Although they probably have them flagged accordingly)
