• Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 days ago

    Im shocked he didn’t just shoot.

    Cameraman is brave has fuck to be heckling the single digit IQ party member.

  • PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    188
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Bootlicker: "wHaT’s thE cONtExt¿

    Rational person: this is unacceptable no matter the context.

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I would only see this behavior as excusable IF there were a machine pistol involved. Or a rocket launcher, or a bmx riding down an 80ft tall cliff onto a ramp.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 days ago

        Too much chance of hitting someone unrelated. There could have been kids around any of those turns he blindly flew around.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          I mean it turned out there was a 50 plus year old house at the end of one of his blind turns which did him in!

    • sloppysol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Is it an either/or, though? I’ve got both those thoughts at the same time.

      As rational as it is to know it’s unacceptable, what IS the context? And how can we have proper distribution of just consequences?

        • vithigar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t think the person you’re responding to is trying to suggest otherwise. You can be curious about the context even while accepting that no possible context makes this okay.

          I too am curious about what, exactly, set this officer off to escalate to such completely deranged behaviour. Not because I think there’s a justification, just because I want to know exactly what kind of lunacy this is.

          • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Probably just racism. The cop “knew” the pedestrian was a dangerous criminal, he just didn’t have any probable cause. So he had to take matters into his own hands.

      • Soulg@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nothing wrong with being curious about the context. Don’t let the dog pile get you down, too many people want to just hate blindly to feel good.

        It’s much better to understand fully why you hate, imo

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      129
      ·
      4 days ago

      “…this incident does not reflect the values or standards of the Baltimore Police Department.”

      • ALQ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        94
        ·
        4 days ago

        Unless they charge him with the crimes he committed, there’s no way they can convince me this isn’t a perfect reflection of their values and standards.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Jesus Christ that headline “officer suspended after viral video appears to show him almost running a man over” should instead be “officer suspended after viral video appears to show him attempting to run a man over” but local journalism is all but dead so good luck

      Edit: also how the FUCK did they not include the video?! It’s literally a dudes video recording posted to social media and I don’t care if they have to take 20 minutes to censor it a little so little Timmy doesn’t hear a naughty word in the footage of a cop attempting vehicular murder, they should have already gotten permission to include the video on the article or at least included a link to it. They included a single still so it’s not like they haven’t seen it!

  • Nednarb44@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Protect” and serve by needlessly endangering literally anyone in the vicinity. Classic

  • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    4 days ago

    Jesus fuck, where do you Yankees get these officers from? leftovers from the McD, trained on Need for Spoed or what?

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    That dipshit cop is on trouble with his bosses, and all of his colleagues are going to seriously torture him. Good chance he gets fired. You can’t rampage through a busy city neighborhood trying to deliberately run down a citizen. I highly doubt we’ll be seeing a police captain on TV saying that he followed his extensive training and department policy perfectly.

    • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Are you kidding? I can’t tell. Don’t these cops just get a paid vacation until people forget about their crimes?

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Usually, but this isn’t a gun case, which they always have to defend to the heavens, no matter how wrong it is. This is just a stupid cop, behaving ridiculously.

  • alekwithak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t think the police should behave this way. If their duty is to law and order then this behavior is the antithesis of that, unlawful and creates disorder. Look at all of the drivers not knowing what to do, probably scared shitless that a cop is going to hit them and they’ll somehow be found at fault. Do you think the owner of the house he crashed into is going to see a dime? Maybe if they sue the city, but probably not. Can’t sue the officer thanks to his immunity from the consequences of his own actions. Ugh I set out to write something tongue in cheek but this shit is honestly just too infuriating.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    4 days ago

    Most obvious case of attempted manslaughter I’ve seen this week. Bake him away, toys.