• abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    25 minutes ago

    Man who is the CEO of a business selling mass surveillance beyond the likes of even George Orwell’s 1984 says we should run head first into a surveillance state from which he will directly profit from.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 minute ago

    It’s funny how many governments are getting surveillance wrong. Mass surveillance and aggregating the data with other social network databases is where the danger is at. Personal surveillance is right up there with recording authorities abusing their power and protecting your home. Ironically, the reverse is happening. The same governments where laws like GDPR criminalize personal surveillance also sign up for palantir’s services and mass surveillance systems as they allow companies to no longer give a shit on their websites about the GDPR and effectively allow them to collect all the personal data GDPR was supposed to protect. People shouldn’t be so keen to disseminate public videos onto social networks, but they should definitely be allowed to record and submit them to the authorities or to the courts if necessary.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The public needs public mass surveillance on CEOs and the top 1% only. They are the top threat to the world

    • Insekticus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      1000% this.

      They’re predators, both sexually and economically, and society has let them get away with their plans for far too long.

  • pasdechance@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is Bubble-101. Before the thing exists, imagine the future

    threatening that another country will get there first combined with pure players like Nvidia, the uncertainty of whether or not it could be a good investment and being able to convince governments and investors to pump money into it.

    If AGI ever becomes what they are promising, everything after 2022 should be a case study for marketing and communications students because they are doing a piss-poor job inspiring confidence and just sound like grifters.

  • boaratio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If you’ve never seen this guy giving a talk, it’s worth looking at. This guy is a total tweeker. Can’t sit still, and has insane thoughts he’s just willing to say in public.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What’s crazy is I agree with some of what he says, but disagree entirely with his company.

      Basically, he says the Antichrist promises security in exchange for giving up your freedom. However, his company does exactly that, it promises security in exchange for taking away freedom from the people. So at best he’s a hypocrite and at worst an accelerationist.

      I agree that people are willing to trade freedom for security, but I disagree that’s what governments should do. Governments need to protect freedoms first, and security second.

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Oh! This must be the guy who was called out on that exact thing and it gave him serious pause before he was able to jump-start the bullsh-tting part of his brain.

  • cv_octavio@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I bet you’d be able to get a great grip on his hair as you wind up with the other hand for that oh-so-punchable face.

  • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    CEOs are getting too comfortable again. One needs to be pew-pewed in the streets to thin the herd and guarantee next year’s harvest!

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    China WILL win the AI race and that’s because they invested in infrastructure and their power grid.

    The US could have done that too, but we gave the money to billionaires instead. Building a surveillance state doesn’t fix any of the mistakes we made and they’ll still win the AI race.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Not to sound like a tankie but China has made smarter decisions with regard to power generation. The current shift away from renewables (and shift back to fossil fuel) AND more reliance on central power generation are great for billionaires but just dumb for every other reason. And with the what appears to be advancing in battery technology more distributed solar cells with local storage would free up more power for the power hungry data centers. Not to mention the AI programs there are not run by douchebags like Sam Altman and Mustafa Suleyman.

      I also think the current path of AGI study via more advanced LLM research is the wrong path. A language generator is never going to be “smart”. But what do I know, I don’t have billions of dollars and lie constantly.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        So we need to start covert anti-corruption efforts n China, since China will win, we don’t want a single party member destroying the world…I don’t know what we can actually do, but it is crucial for the human race that China develops more benevolent values if at all possible.

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Can somebody please hack this guys socials and leak all his private info so we see him eat his words?