• Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    You know the author isn’t married and stated as much, right? Getting this upset over their hypothetical marriage is a little extreme. Especially when the article says absolutely nothing about “protecting the children.”

    People are allowed to break off romantic and non-romantic relationships for whatever reason they desire. It sounds like you don’t particularly want to be friends or date anyone that doesn’t like AI, so I’m not sure what the problem is for you… that other people have different moral standards and world views than you?

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It was hypothetical and the response to that hypothetical question was emotional.

      The children example was clearly talking about other articles.

      Yes, people are allowed to break up for whatever reason, but this specific reason is incredibly shallow.

      I do have friends that don’t like AI and I wouldn’t dream of dropping them because of it. It’s insane, it’s just a difference in opinion. I want meaningful relationships, not an echo chamber.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          No, it has nothing to do with “if I like it” but the substance of the response. If the person said the opposite (dropped friends that didn’t like AI), I would have the same reaction.

          If their fiance tells them they use chatgpt and their first response is to call off the wedding, it’s clear there is little actual logic going on, which leaves emotion. It’s also incredibly shallow.

          This is “picking friends because of their favorite sport team” energy.