Are all uses of ai out of the question?
I understand most of the reasoning around this. Training ai models requires gigantic datacenters that consume copious amounts of resources (electricity and water) making them more expensive for everyone for something that doesn’t have much benefits. If anything it feels like its fuled a downturn in quality of content, intelligence and pretty much everything.
With the recent job market in the US I’ve found myself having little to no choice on what I work on and I’ve found myself working on ai.
The more I learn about it the angrier I get about things like generative ai. So things that are open ended like generating art or prose. Ai should be a tool to help us, not take away the things that make us happy so others can make a quick buck taking a shortcut.
It doesn’t help that ai is pretty shit at these jobs, spending cycles upon cycles of processing just to come up with hallucinated slop.
But I’m beginning to think that when it comes to ai refinement there’s actually something useful there. The idea is to use heuristics that run on your machine to reduce the context and amount of iterations/cycles that an ai/LLM spends on a specific query. Thus reducing the chance of hallucinations and stopping the slop. The caveat is that this can’t be used for artistic purposes as it requires you to be able to digest and specify context and instructions, which is harder to do for generative ai (maybe impossible, I haven’t gone down that rabbit hole cause I don’t think ai should be generating any type of art at all)
The ultimate goal behind refinement is making existing models more useful, reducing the need to be coming up with new models every season and consuming all our resources to generate more garbage.
And then making the models themselves need less hardware and less resources when executed.
I can come up with some examples if people want to hear more about it.
How do you all feel about that? Is it still a hard no in that context for ai?
All in all hopefully I won’t be working much longer in this space but I’ll make the most of what I’m contributing to it to make it better and not further reckless consumption.
The main problem with “AI” is that it doesn’t exist. It’s a grift based on pseudo-science and hype.
As far as the diverse technologies falsely labelled as “AI”, they’ll largely suffer the same fate as any technology under capitalism: The technology will be used for resource extraction, extreme privilege, and violent enforcement.
I agree that some of these technologies are actually useful and getting better. For example. I enjoy search summaries even though they’re not always perfect. However, there is absolutely no “intelligence” involved in these computer programs. Furthermore, I think the the applications to grifting, violence, surveillance, cops/prisons, genocide, etc. far outweigh the almost insignificant progress in search summaries, auto-complete, chatbots, content generation, and other so-called “AI” programs. The term “AI” is used to lump these diverse programs together in order to collective success and deny failure. In order to promote genocidal applications under the cover of applications for generating pictures of cats.
I prefer more scientifically accurate terms like statistics, big data, etc., but there are much less useful for grifting, expose the underlying grift (eg. stealing/spying data, using math/computation instead of magic, the value of individual programs, etc.)… The term “AI” is used to obscure the scientific reality. None of these companies want to talk about where their data comes from or how it’s manipulated. It’s just “intelligence” smh. “AI” is a whitewashing term to obscure the many underlying problems. So more scientifically valid terms are almost completely avoided.