‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘

Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01

  • valtia@lemmy.worldEnglish
    21·
    1 day ago

    What the business wants and what they say they want are two completely different things. They still want people to be able to think and solve their own problems, even if they end up assigning the praise for your hard work on the AI you only pretended to use

    • themaninblack@lemmy.world
      15·
      23 hours ago

      This is a new pattern that I am seeing. C suite is required to launch AI initiatives because of market expectation, tech staff expected to launder their work through Claude

      • cmbabul@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        16 hours ago

        And literally all of them can fuck right off and fire me before I do that, the only thing keeping me from being fully radicalized against this system is that I am still(just barely) able to afford food and shelter.