• L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Z is always depth. Both are correct but define different perspectives. Top is looking across the landscape from an arbitrary floating perspective, bottom is looking down with anchored mapping to the surface.

    • moderatecentrist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Good answer. Many posts are people saying “my approach is the right one, other people are irredeemable morons who should burn in hell”, but you’re right, it depends on your perspective.

    • juliebean@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      yep. in 2 dimensions, nobody really debates on whether x or y should point up, so i kinda think the debate about z stems from whether one thinks we should put the xy plane horizontally (like a sheet of paper on a desk), or vertically (like a chalkboard).

      does any software default to making x be the vertical axis?

    • isar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Smh I was fine with both. The upper one reminded me of the X Y axis we use to represent functions in maths. While the lower one represents altitude on a 3D map.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Spent most my life working in a 3d environment… need to reverse that thing for a controller every single time