I don’t care if you hate it or love it, I just wanna know why you feel the way you do. Bonus points if you want to speak on specific categories you like/dislike.

  • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m a fan of the product, but hate a lot of aspects of how it’s made.

    1. Actors have so much stigmatism to deal with just to work.

    2. People are abused far too frequently and lack a lot of protections that they should have.

    3. i fucking loathe only fans. It’s added a brand new breed of spammers dropping shitty strip teases full of links onto any amateur porn site, normally completely unrelated to whatever place they’re posting. If I’m looking at the tinytits sub, your giant tiddy goth gf post is not going to make me send you $5.

      • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Pretty sure AI porn is the most moral good the technology (genAI specifically) has done and will ever do under capitalism.

      • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Extremely negatively. We already have an overabundance of free porn catering to effectively any fetish you could want, and even fringe stuff has sites, OF models, and r34 artists willing to commission it.

        We do not need to use absurd amounts of water and electricity to produce something that’s already very available. If you have a fetish so niche that you need AI to generate it, you can either pay someone to do it/draw it, or go without.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Eh I disagree with the power usage point, specifically. Don’t listen to Altman lie through his teeth; generation and training should be dirt cheap.

          See the recent Z Image, which was trained on a shoestring budget and costs basically nothing to run: https://arxiv.org/html/2511.22699v2

          The task energy per image is less than what it took for me to type out this comment.


          As for if we “need” it, yeah, that’s a good point and what I was curious about.

          But then again… I don’t get why people use a lot of porn services. As an example, I just don’t see the appeal of OF, yet it’s a colossal enterprise.

        • Artisian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          As already indicated; energy and water use is not so big. It costs substantially more data center time to store and stream high def film then to generate even hundreds of images. Generation itself is very resource cheap compared to human actors and a film crew.