Yes, currently AI isn’t reliable enough to use instead of a human. All the big AI businesses bet that this will change - either by training with more data or some technological breakthrough.
They tried that with Theranos because Elizabeth Holmes’ machine could correctly identify four viruses.
Presumably LLM’s have already trained on the entirety of human knowledge and communication and still produce buggy information, so I’m skeptical that it’ll work out the way the VC’s expect, but we’ll see.
Yes, currently AI isn’t reliable enough to use instead of a human. All the big AI businesses bet that this will change - either by training with more data or some technological breakthrough.
Could be they’re right.
They tried that with Theranos because Elizabeth Holmes’ machine could correctly identify four viruses.
Presumably LLM’s have already trained on the entirety of human knowledge and communication and still produce buggy information, so I’m skeptical that it’ll work out the way the VC’s expect, but we’ll see.
Thisthread is not about AI, it’s about pattern predictions snake oil.