• NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      IIRC there is a legally defined set of criteria to call foodstuffs organic. It does mean something, but if has nothing to do with chemistry’s definition of organic.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah, there’s still legally-defined sets of criteria for how to marry a child in the majority of US states, that’s not a good precedent for anything.

        • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          That’s hardly relevant. All I’m saying is that this label is not a “blatant lie” like this thread calls for, it means something and it’s regulated.

          • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            It’s very relevant, it being codified is the foundation of your argument. Lies can be codified and laws can be ignored. And both often are. Sure it’s not a traditional lie, it’s more like a lie of implication. Like labeling your product “0% poison” and running a big ad campaign about how your competitors don’t say their products are poison-free. Just pick a different word that doesn’t already apply to all food.

    • iegod@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I hate the use of this term by the food industry. Bitch it’s all organic.