• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    normally that would be a sensible tact.

    Yet, you came here to say “As opposed to the many reputable news sources and scientific publications that run contrary?”

    with not even a cunthair of evidence for those contrary points. “nuh uh you should search I’m right but can’t be fucked to give a shred of evidence”

    you fucking fuckheads

    • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m 4 pages into a paper on the subject. Want something on air pollution, check out grok in Memphis. Something about water table distruction, check the rural New York one.

      If you want me to cite something obscure like some strangeness between weak and strong NP-Completeness? Sure. That makes sense.

      If someone wants me to cite a source regarding whether prime numbers are real I’m just going to tell them to stop being stupid and ask Google.

      That is how simple this one is. I have hundreds of citations, both scientific and mass media. They took almost zero effort to find.

      I would challenge you to avoid being lazy and stupid.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m 4 pages into a paper on the subject.

        am intimately familiar with the shitshow in Memphis.

        searching new york data center water table destruction gives some links to stories related to datacenter water use but nothing specific to NY or AI. duckduckgo and google (non ai) searched.

        I would challenge your assumptions but you’re just an asshole. Have a great life.