The US Supreme Court will not issue a ruling on Friday (January 9), in a high-profile case challenging the legality of President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs.

The case, which tests the limits of presidential authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, had drawn close attention from businesses, investors, and international trading partners.

The US Supreme Court will not issue a ruling on Friday (January 9), in a high-profile case challenging the legality of President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs.

The case, which tests the limits of presidential authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, had drawn close attention from businesses, investors, and international trading partners.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They are trying to find a way to let Trump keep the tariff money. If the tariffs are unconstitutional then Trump will be sued for billions and billions from businesses and governments.

    • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not Trump that will be sued to pay back the money unconstitutionally taken, it is the U.S., and the money will come from your tax dollars.

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        This. The Supreme Court already ruled that Trump cannot be held liable for crimes he may commit while doing his job as president.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well, yes, but also that wouldn’t have applied in this case anyway. Politicians manage the public purse, they’re not personally liable for it.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        They already took our tax dollars in the form of added tariffs and in no case is it coming back to us. The money certainly isn’t going to do more good in Trump’s hands. He’s already been trying to frame it as a presidential slush fund.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      If the tariffs are unconstitutional then Trump will be sued for billions and billions from businesses and governments.

      Oh, it’s worse than that. Very large companies might be able to afford to sue to get that revenue back, but others can’t afford the legal fees to do that.

      But Wall St. has a solution! Firms have started buying tariff refund rights from importers, at a discount to reflect the uncertainty regarding whether those tariffs will ever be refunded.

      One of the largest firms doing this is Cantor Fitzgerald, who was run by the Commerce Secretary before he took office and is now run by his sons.

      See! They figured out how to grift, no matter the outcome!

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        But Wall St. has a solution! Firms have started buying tariff refund rights from importers, at a discount to reflect the uncertainty regarding whether those tariffs will ever be refunded.

        Jesus fucking Christ, I thought you were joking

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    I see. The Supreme Court saw the saying, “Justice delayed is justice denied” and finally found a way to deny justice!

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      What? Oh, no. It’s nothing sinister like that. They just got some shiny new toys for Christmas that they want to play with on their all-expenses-paid vacation with their friends.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh, they don’t have their toys yet. Because that would be a “bribe”, and super illegal.

        No, they get their toys after the fact. Then it’s called a Gratuity, and totes legal.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, the indications are very strong that they’re going to rule against him on this one. The supreme court like Trump, but they like big business better.

      The delay is probably over the question of how to handle the tariffs that have already been collected. In principle, they would have to be refunded, but doing that would blow a massive hole in the budget, at a point where the US is already carrying the kind of debt load that looks really scary to investors, and has slashed incomes to essentially nothing with all their tax cuts.

  • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    In the shithole that is lawless America it is no longer a court anymore, supreme or otherwise. It’s just a bunch of people wearing weird clothes saying meaningless things.

    The funny thing about law is that it protects you, me, everybody. When you abandon law, it no longer protects anyone or anything. There is no such thing as murder, or ICE, or Police or terrorist or Supreme Court, or President. Without a constitution and the rule of law, it is all a naked, barbaric contest for power by savages.

    :popcorn:

    Let the games begin I guess.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, as an American I see the federal government as a lawless corrupt dictatorship that certainly has the power to destroy lives, but no legitimacy.