NEW YORK (AP) — Luigi Mangione returned to federal court Friday for a pivotal hearing in his fight to bar the government from seeking the death penalty against him in the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

Mangione’s lawyers contend that authorities prejudiced his case by turning his December 2024 arrest into a “Marvel movie” spectacle and by publicly declaring their desire to see him executed even before he was formally indicted.

If that doesn’t work, they argue, the charge that has enabled the government to seek the death penalty — murder by firearm — should be thrown out because it is legally flawed.

Federal prosecutors say Mangione’s lawyers are wrong, countering that the murder charge is legally sufficient and that “pretrial publicity, even when intense” is hardly a constitutional crisis. Any concerns about public perceptions can be alleviated by carefully questioning prospective jurors about their knowledge of the case, prosecutors wrote in a court filing.

Mangione has pleaded not guilty to federal and state murder charges, which carry the possibility of life in prison.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This will be interesting as it will set the precedent for when Jonathan Ross is tried. /s

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    The real question is, would they be seeking the death penalty if there wasn’t some form of political support for him? I don’t think they would be.

    I don’t think jury nullification should be used lightly. But if the government is trying to kill a guy for political reasons, then it is the most rational choice.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Oh yeah, the Feds and State are playing both ends against the middle. If they get turned down by the state, they take another run at it with the Feds. These psychos never heard of double jeopardy.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      2 days ago

      A death penalty charge was laughed out of state court. This article is about federal court. Luigi is facing trial simultaneously at both levels.

      The previous hearing on the evidence suppression for 4th and 5th amendment violations was completed in state court. Mangione has to reargue all of those issues again in federal court. And the two court systems could come to different conclusions.

      Plus there are a couple of extra items that are federal only, that the article mentions.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        And the two court systems could come to different conclusions.

        Which is why they should have to choose one path, and stick to it. The guy committed a crime (allegedly), and he should be tried once for it, not over and over until they get a judge or jury who goes along. This is why we have double jeopardy.

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Here’s some explanation of the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine.

          New York State is a sovereign state that derives original sovereign power from the citizens of New York. Meanwhile, the United States is also an original sovereign power that derives its power from the entire people of the United States. (Remember, the Constitution is established by “we, the People”. The U.S. is not just an agreement between individual states). Both governments have original power over the geographic territory of New York. The regular powers of government are split between the two according to the terms of the Constitution.

          Thus, New York State can exercise its General Police Power to prosecute Mr. Mangione for murder. This power is not granted by the Constitution, but it is recognized by the Constitution. The United States government can simultaneously exercise its power to Regulate Interstate Commerce, by prosecuting Mr. Mangione for the crime of “interstate stalking that caused the death of a person.”

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Yeah, well that sword cuts both ways. If the Feds decide to give that ICE Killer a pass, Minnesota gets to take a run at him. The difference is that Luigi is likely to survive two juries, due to Jury Nullification, at least (plus a weak case), while the ICE Killer is unlikely to survive both (plus an easy case)

      • kungen@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wtf, I thought that was the whole point of “double jeopardy”. The US court system is even more messed up than I imagined.

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          State / federal dual sovereignty is a very infamous loophole to double jeopardy.

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s more common than you might think. This is why there are federal and state prisons. Federal and state statues and judges. It’s a complex system.

          Basically the federal and state don’t override each other on this.

            • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I’m not a lawyer, just drink with one, but my understanding is double jeopardy applies to each level separately. So the state can’t try him twice for murder, and feds can’t try him twice for murder, but each can try him separately.

              There’s a guy on YouTube, Legal Eagle, he might have a video explaining double jeopardy that’s worth watching

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Then he only goes to jail one time. If you get convicted of both, you can end up being released from one and immediately re-arrested for the other.

            • frongt@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              19 hours ago

              The sentences would probably run consecutively (13). I don’t know if federal and state sentences can run concurrently.