As ICE agents surged into Minneapolis, they found actual road ice to be more than a match for their wits and driving skill.

  • ebolapie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I don’t see what the big deal is. Go slow and leave plenty of following distance. Fucking duh. They used our money to buy themselves giant 4x4 suburbans and even with every advantage they can’t drive in winter conditions? Pathetic

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ve lived most of my life in a desert. Still managed just fine the few times I’ve had to drive in a couple of inches of snow. These idiots have no excuse.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Using common sense and critical thinking is the antipathy for GOP and supporters of the regime. Follow all orders post haste

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      19 hours ago

      “Instructions unclear. Shot the ice, shoveled as much of it into the back of the van as possible.”

    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      20 hours ago

      A 4x4 will give you extra power. But not extra stopping power. My guess is they assume that they could just drive normal due to this.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What do you want to bet most of these guys are from the south?

        They are hilarious to watch drive in any kind of winter conditions.

      • ebolapie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        20 hours ago

        As one would expect from the common dumbass who drives a full size SUV. And before anyone gets a bruised ego, no, not everyone who drives a full size SUV is a dumbass. But it would seem that most of them are.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Basically everyone in a full size suv is a dumbass. Most people use them as a daily commuter when a sedan would be just fine. Given the added purchase cost, maintenance costs, and fuel costs they might as well just be burning money.

          Reminds me of how my dad is obsessed with wanting a SUV large enough that he can tow with. He hasn’t towed anything outside of work ever. He’s going to buy a car that’s way more expensive and costs more in gas so he could theoretically one day tow something. Man doesn’t even own a trailer

          • Stabbitha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            From what I’ve seen like 90% of full size SUV drivers should’ve just gotten an Outback, 5% would’ve been fine with a mid size, and the last 5% actually need one that big.

          • bearboiblake@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            16 hours ago

            but have you considered that the line wouldn’t go up if people weren’t manipulated into buying things they don’t need?

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Wull yeah he don’t own a trailer becuz his car cain’t tow one. When he gets his bigass SUV he’s gunna tow yer mom.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Saw a used car with AWD for sale with the ad saying that AWD is better for acceleration, cornering AND stopping in slippery conditions.

        I honestly wanted to ring the dude up and ask how it would help with the stopping, given that it’s heavier than the RWD version of the same car and they both have exactly 4 wheels worth of braking power.

        • Markus29@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Manual drives are more common here, when you brake on the engine 4 wheels are decelerating instead of 2 so that could help.

          • Noxy@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            No car only brakes with only two wheels. All four wheels are used when the brake pedal is pressed.

            And in any case, using brakes with ABS is still better than engine braking without ABS when stopping in any condition, but especially on snow or ice

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            I’m not an expert or anything, but wouldn’t engine breaking have the same breaking force (just spread across all wheels) for 4 wheel drive as 2 wheel drive? Unlike break pads, where it’s one per wheel, engine breaking will all be running through the same engine.

            Still, having it one 4 instead of 2 has advantages, but I don’t think it’d be more force.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            But engine braking doesn’t stop your car fast enough to even worry about traction much. And if you do lose traction with engine braking, I don’t think ABS can help you like with actual braking.

            It was also xDrive so the front axle is only powered when rear wheels start slipping AFAIK.