And what makes you think “and that’s bad too” doesn’t? Seriously. Explain your work.
Was there not enough histrionics or wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth for you?
So explain your logic and thoughts about why you think EVERY FUCKING RESPONSE needs to cater to your whims?
The entire fucking planet knows that Nazi trillionaires selling a service that can be used for child porn, at least be accurate, is BAD. Are you serious right now?
DO you hang around so many Nazi pedos that this needs to be constantly reiterated lest you forget?
Any dickless loser seeking out the material is a problem.
The dude who institutionalized illegal porn is a worldwide threat to children. We are talking orders of magnitude more dangerous to individuals and to society.
That the combination of words that I used to describe shouldn’t even be allowed to exist and will likely be a liner notes in any surviving history.
If we are outraged enough to admonish anyone involved it should be the child porn profiteer, not relegating his moral failings under the broad category of “oh, yea, that’s bad, too.”
Any dickless loser seeking out the material is a problem.
Which is why I said as much in my very first response in this thread.
The dude who institutionalized illegal porn is a worldwide threat to children. We are talking orders of magnitude more dangerous to individuals and to society.
And what makes you think I don’t/didn’t believe this was true? Explain using full sentences, please.
I’m suggesting that Musk is creating a dangerous and unprecedented situation for children around the globe and that this should be everyones primary focus.
You are essentially arguing that “all crimes matter,” which isn’t wrong but is woefully misguided.
I’m suggesting that Musk is creating a dangerous and unprecedented situation for children around the globe and that this should be everyones primary focus.
And that’s cool. Start your own post. No one can read your mind, bro. And honestly, few people appreciate intrusive misunderstanding. You might want to work on that.
You are essentially arguing that “all crimes matter,” which isn’t wrong but is woefully misguided.
Wrong. YOU INTERPRETED IT THAT WAY.
“And that’s bad too” is apparently your trigger phrase. Have a better thinker than you explain why you over reacted.
Really I’ve only rearticulated the same one-point repeatedly. I’m a bit shocked that we don’t both hold consensus on that fact. But that’s been my entire point.
You are correct about one thing, you do remind me of Reddit. Somebody comes in with a difference of opinion and they must be flat out wrong.
Nope. Just think that we should all recognize the root evil here is the Nazi billionaire that is selling a child porn subscription service.
You know. Because Nazi billionaires selling child porn subscription services is a real actual terrible thing.
And what makes you think “and that’s bad too” doesn’t? Seriously. Explain your work.
Was there not enough histrionics or wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth for you?
So explain your logic and thoughts about why you think EVERY FUCKING RESPONSE needs to cater to your whims?
The entire fucking planet knows that Nazi trillionaires selling a service that can be used for child porn, at least be accurate, is BAD. Are you serious right now?
DO you hang around so many Nazi pedos that this needs to be constantly reiterated lest you forget?
Holy moly.
Any dickless loser seeking out the material is a problem.
The dude who institutionalized illegal porn is a worldwide threat to children. We are talking orders of magnitude more dangerous to individuals and to society.
That the combination of words that I used to describe shouldn’t even be allowed to exist and will likely be a liner notes in any surviving history.
If we are outraged enough to admonish anyone involved it should be the child porn profiteer, not relegating his moral failings under the broad category of “oh, yea, that’s bad, too.”
Which is why I said as much in my very first response in this thread.
And what makes you think I don’t/didn’t believe this was true? Explain using full sentences, please.
Thanks.
I’m suggesting that Musk is creating a dangerous and unprecedented situation for children around the globe and that this should be everyones primary focus.
You are essentially arguing that “all crimes matter,” which isn’t wrong but is woefully misguided.
It is about the framing of the narrative.
And that’s cool. Start your own post. No one can read your mind, bro. And honestly, few people appreciate intrusive misunderstanding. You might want to work on that.
Wrong. YOU INTERPRETED IT THAT WAY.
“And that’s bad too” is apparently your trigger phrase. Have a better thinker than you explain why you over reacted.
And you’re the narrative police, apparently.
You typing multiple paragraphs and then accusing the other user of over reacting is incredibly funny.
He is a very sane boy.
It’s ok little buddy, you’ll learn to read more than quipy one-liners eventually. Maybe.
To use your words you seem triggered. You ok, bro?
Oh I’m fine. I’m just trying to get thru to knuckleheads who can’t read.
“Um Akshually” Reddit Guy who can’t read is one of my pet peeves.
You very much embody the spirit of the reddit “big brain.”
So, what you are saying is that we can’t make judgement calls and that all crimes matter?
You really haven’t managed to say anything otherwise.
Holy fuck, what?
The truly weird thing here is you think YOU have.lol
Really I’ve only rearticulated the same one-point repeatedly. I’m a bit shocked that we don’t both hold consensus on that fact. But that’s been my entire point.
You are correct about one thing, you do remind me of Reddit. Somebody comes in with a difference of opinion and they must be flat out wrong.