https://archive.is/NnhhZ

“That’s completely unheard of,” Janne Haaland Matlary, a professor with the University of Oslo and a former politician, told public broadcaster NRK. “It’s a total lack of respect for the award, on her part,” she said, calling the act “meaningless” and “pathetic.”

LOL @ the both of them.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    It would be funny if the committee said that no one can have two Nobel peace prize medals so Trump can’t be nominated again.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    58 minutes ago

    It’s funny that he thinks this will mean people see him as the winner, in the future, and not a petty little bitch. This will literally have the opposite effect of what he’s looking for.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s not transferable. She gave him the gold trinket because that’s how you play Trump, but Trump doesn’t get the actual peace prize assigned to him. People in here talking as if Trump actually got it.

    • runiq@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You’re right, sorry for the oversight, I added one now. (I just used Firefox reader mode.)

  • blattrules@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Him pushing for and then accepting someone else’s peace prize award says everything anyone needs to know about him: he’s the biggest asshole in the world and has no shame.

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Don’t forget the middle part where he used the US military to kill a bunch of people and kidnap her main political foe.

      I believe that if I were a past recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize I would be returning it. Not the money though, because fuck 'em, I’ll keep the money.

      • blattrules@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        For sure, as a New Yorker, I’ve known longer than that, but it still amazes me that there are people who don’t know yet.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I hold he’s afraid of dying because he’s so close to death’s door that he’s doing the prosperity gospel’s thing of trying to look good for god. He’s siphoning all the money he can, getting awards and structures built for him thinking it’s his way into heaven. Because a man like that would see holy salvation as transactional.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Then revoke it from her. It won’t stop Trump from having his physical participation trophy. But it will put a big fat asterisk next to that year’s every and send a message to future winners.

    Better still, let the spite flow through them: revoke it and award that year to someone who Trump fucking hates.

  • GeriatricGambino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Wow. I’m gonna start using the phrase «on a scale from zero to Maria Corina Machado regifting her Nobel prize, how desperate and useless are you right now?»

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Give the prize to a shit person, expect shit behaviour.

    Also, Trump is a fucking spoiled toddler. He is an octogenarian Dudley Dursley.

  • LordMayor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The way I see it the Nobel Peace Prize committee can do one of two things to save the reputation of the award:

    • stop giving out the award and dissolve the committee or
    • make a rule that it can’t be awarded to politicians.
    • TheBunGod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The same reason they gave it to Obama right before he started bombing civilians in the middle east with drones. It’s a political maneuver that backfired.

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Exactly. The peace prize means nothing. Hasn’t since Kissinger got it. 🤡

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because there were (and still are) real problems in Venezuela. She is a key figure in the opposition, and it’s widely suspected that the opposition party won the last election, but Maduro’s party fucked with the vote.

      In a sane world that respects Democracy, it sends a statement that the popular will should be respected, and that the Maduro government was illegitimate. I don’t think the Nobel committee expected their award to precipitate armed intervention, which is the opposite of peace.

      It’s even more ironic because it’s not like the will of the Venezuelan people is being honored, even now. Trump is ignoring Machado’s party (even after “accepting” that gift of the medal) and is extorting what is left of the government in Venezuela to funnel oil money into a secret bank account.

      Basically, the award makes sense in a pre-Trump world, but he has changed all the rules. That last cheeseburger can’t come fast enough…

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I don’t think the Nobel committee expected their award to precipitate armed intervention, which is the opposite of peace.

        Then they’re idiots and the prize itself is worthless. That was clear as day going to be the promoted result. If they just wanted to promote democracy they could have easily chosen an activist in a country not in the process of being attacked or an activist that wasn’t currently encouraging war.

        I don’t give them the benefit of assumed stupidity. I think they were neoliberals who were particularly concerned by the nationalized interested in Venezuela and who thought even if they found him abhorrent Trump could be a good tool to help set the imperialist-capitalist world back arright.

        • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Then they’re idiots and the prize itself is worthless.

          It’s been that way at least since they gave it to known war-monger Henry Kissinger…

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Then they’re idiots and the prize itself is worthless.

          I don’t think we disagree on that point…

  • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    He already got that sweet fifa piece prize, how much more proof of how peaceful he is does he need. I guess he’s gonna liberate the Greenlandic peace prize next.

    For how fucking worthless all this is now, at least the pageantry is telling.