• dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Okay, since its obviously hyperbole that it isnt possible, its a potential outcome so lets return to my original question (deemed a massive assumption on my part by you):

    once it no longer needs massive amounts of expensive resources, what then?

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      So copypasting your question does what…? If you can’t be bothered to think through my answer and think of a different question, then go re-read the answer I already gave you.

      • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        51 minutes ago

        Okay, its called a hypothetical, which you ignored. I therefore ignored your bad faith attempt at diverting the discussion at hand. Hypothetically, what happens when it is energy efficient? Its not impossible. I am only saying, sure do whatever you gotta do to regulate ai now, but it will eventually get there, and then what?

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          Then, hyperbolically, and hypothetically, the entire electronic and computing world is massively changed and not just AI. Because such a change wouldn’t be limited to AI’s use. I wish you wouldn’t keep playing with the conditions of the argument myopically in an attempt to be right. If you don’t like someone criticizing hyperbole and hypotheticals, don’t use them.

          • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 minutes ago

            Don’t bother discussing, they will delete their comments once they lose the argument