• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I can’t tell if you’ve forgotten how good search was, are too young to know better, or were never good at using search.

    I’m telling you that you didn’t have to “dig through the answers” if you formatted the search well. It worked. You obviously couldn’t trust everything you read on the internet, but the tricky part was formatting. No digging was required once you were good enough at key words, syntax, and search functions (“” , + - site:). Search results were incredibly efficient and effective. It was amazing.

    AI is now maybe as efficient and effective as search results used to be. That’s it. They ruined search and gave us AI.

    And they’ll ruin AI too, just you watch.

    • canofcam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You had to “dig through answers” as in, you got your answer, in the form of a website that you then had to click into and scan for the answer.

      AI is far more efficient. I can’t tell if you are delusional or just willfully ignorant. Ask a question and in two seconds you have a succinct answer with all of the information that using a search tool (now, and in the past) would provide you.

      I also don’t disagree that they will ‘ruin AI’, I’m not defending it or the creators of it in the slightest. I am simply saying it can be an extremely effective tool and it is without a shadow of a doubt better than using a search engine to get the answer to a question.