• agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh damn you right we should’ve voted for the magical third party that definitely would’ve won

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Oh damn, we should continue to just suffer in this system and not demand better about it because can’t change it!” - That’s what you sound like right now.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m in favor of changing the system but I’m not going to let the idea of a better system delude me into thinking that we’re in that improved system already. We absolutely should change the system, but when you look at the system we had at the time of the election, who else were people going to vote for if they didn’t want trump to win? We didn’t have ranked choice, we didn’t even get a primary for the Democrats.

        Blaming the Democrats for not winning is taking away the blame and attention away from the people everyone should be mad at, the Republicans. Dems fucked up, but that’s not holding Republicans accountable for what they are doing right now.

      • mghackerlady@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        We should demand that it be better, but shooting ourselves in the foot while doing it is only going to give us a shot foot

        • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          We’re already shooting ourselves in the foot. The Dems, even when they had a trifecta in 2008, were still dropping the ball. They don’t elect effective people, just people who keep ensuring payments go up and not down.

              • Optional@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                I mean it doesn’t sound like it. You’re not even making an argument, just pointing at things and saying “bad!”

                The difference between that and administrating at the national level is . . . big.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Objectively wrong because there were third party candidates already on the ballot! How could you say they would’ve won when they already were running and lost?! “Oh they would’ve won if they were there” They were there! [These are they!](Third-party and independent candidates for the 2024 United States presidential election - Wikipedia https://share.google/xcOuOQvNZvwLprps9)

        • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I didn’t say they would’ve won, stop moving goal posts.

          I said they couldn’t have lost more than Kamala did. Because it was a binary thing on three counts?

          Did she win the Presidency? No.

          Did she keep the Senate? No.

          Did she win the House? No.

          No matter what you think of Claudia De La Cruz or Jill Stein, it’s just a simple fact neither one of them could have given a worse outcome than that one. And given the resources Kamala had, that’s particularly pathetic.

        • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          She was running for Presidency. And lost. Badly. As her party lost both houses.

          Pick any third party, they won just as much as Kamala did - and didn’t spend a billion and a half to do so.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            What, so you and I are as successful at federal elections as any third party?

            I mean - okay. But some idiots gave them $200 Million for that. We did it for free, apparently.

            I’m saying they’re an unworkable idea at almost any price.

              • Optional@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Can I have some of your $200 million? Or were you one of those low-effort third parties.

                • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  That’s the point - my candidate didn’t need $200 million to do just as well as Kamala did in results.

                  • Optional@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    22 hours ago

                    Well it’s one of those technically true things that’s not really true.

                    Your candidate has no name recognition, got no press, made no waves, and had no chance. As in baseball, at the end of the season all teams lose. Except one.

                    But it’s not baseball.

      • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If by common logic voting is power, we need to organize and vote people into office that better represent us. Not just resign ourselves to this fate. I just don’t understand this desire to not put up any fight at all. It seems counter intuitive to survival.

        • halfsalesman@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I just don’t understand this desire to not put up any fight at all. It seems counter intuitive to survival.

          Bitter and deep spite and resentment. Disgust. Self destructive stubborn catharsis in ruining people who you hate even if it destroys you as well.

          Just as the campists who actively live in “amerikkka” as I do for US citizen non-voters now.

          • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve voted in primaries for better candidates for the Dems since I could vote, for more progressive people so we have good representation. As much as I hate establishment Dems I’m not going to stop trying if for it. I’m disenfranchised by them more often than not and that makes me angry to want to do something, not be spiteful.

            • halfsalesman@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’ll probably still vote for dems for logical self preservation and personal gain if you must know. IDK. We’ll see. My sense of self preservation is in a fight with my resentment and its basically a stalemate.

              I see those stupid fucking “earth destroying comet for president” bumper stickers and think “Yeah sure that’d be unironically good.” now instead of just rolling my eyes.

              • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’ve grown up just being resentful or rolling over and seen how little it helps, how much it hurts you overtime. I have had to fight to just survive, being a little bit off or weird in a highly conservative society is often a social death sentence if not a physical one. I refuse to ever be a helpless victim again, and I’ll find others who refuse that as well.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, but you can’t primary the Dems thoroughly enough before 26 or 28.

        So the only VIABLE option in the near term to STOP FASCISM is voting Dem.

        But I’m sure a bunch of fools will still do the 3rd party thing come 28.

        Normally I’d be fine with them voting 3rd party in midterms, but in case anyone hasn’t noticed, things are getting pretty dark here. This is not the time to fuck around with a 3rd party, even for midterms.

        Vote 3rd party in local/state elections AFTER Americans stop getting executed in the street by masked federal goons. And don’t vote 3rd party for president until a 3rd party can actually win the presidency.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Its almost like democrats should have fixed the source of the spoiler effect by replacing First-past-the-post voting in states they control.

        • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Normally I’d be fine with them voting 3rd party

          Wake up babe, it’s the most important election f our lifetime again.

          Democratic apologists have literally been saying this for 26 years. Your strategy of Vote Blue No Matter Who is what brought you to this point.

          You want to just have the problems go away without any struggle. And it’s not gonna happen.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      They could have won, people like you harassing others is part of the reason they didn’t. Go ahead and keep acting like the smartest guy in the room, you just look like a petulant child trying to force others to agree with you.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Blaming the Democrats for what the Republicans are doing is like blaming the guy who opened the door for the serial killer to get into the house. Yeah, you shouldn’t have done that, yeah, you fucked up, yeah, you knew what would happen, but that’s not the same level of bad as the actual serial killer stabbing people. It’s even shifting blame away from the serial killer and holding the killer less accountable.