• Fred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Damn, did the people vote for that or did the stupid cunts in office did? People you gotta make sure these “elites” have a wake up call, and remind them THEY work for YOU not the other way around. I personally suggest we use force at this point against them, seeing how they make laws that they can’t follow themselves.

    • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Back in 2022 we voted to increase the minimum wage from $9 to $15 by going up $1.50 a year for four years. So the first of the year the minimum wage became $15 an hour. This law was passed by the Senate, so we did not vote on it.

      Side note: The minomum wage for tipped employees is still only $2.13 an hour plus wage compensation

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Holy Shit! At least the people who pass these shitty, oppressive laws will always get their increase. /s

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sen. Jared Storm put it this way.

    “A minimum wage increase is essentially a tax on small businesses," he said.

    What a gaping asshole

    • Gathorall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Small businesses are almost exclusively businesses that need a working class with disposable income. It doesn’t help a steel mill or car company or RAM manufactures that much if the workers have $50 extra spending money, they work a massive market where the consumer demand is global and decoupled from their workers.

      However, the restaranteur, arborist, florist, hairstylist, masseuse, carpenter and countless other small local businesses live of the worker’s disposable income. When they vote to squeeze their few workers they vote to squeeze thousands of customers.

      Corporations of course do not care about the local economy, hell for them it is just a nice bonus if it is a bit shit so they can exploit workers more with the looming threat of unemployment.

      Squeezing the workers is pro-corporate policy and an attack on petit bourgeoisie.

    • Chaotic_Altruist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are so many other effects it is clearly very dissimilar to a tax on small businesses. Mostly it puts money in the hands of consumers.

      My associates in business is superior to Jared Storm’s feeble grip on reality.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      When he has no employees to work in his sweatshop I wonder what his complaint will be then? Probably the “This generation doesn’t want to work!” bS they always say.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, hopefully all of those teen workers that are taking a pay cut as a result of this correctly understand that this also represents a decrease in the amount of effort they should give.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lowering pay for teen workers has the knock-on effect of lowering teen participation in the workforce (at least in Nebraska). I had a friend while I was living in Texas who actually took a summer job in Wisconsin at the prompting of his dad. While I was earning $10/hr doing bullshit retail work, he picked up $25/hr plus benefits at a unionized factory job just outside Madison.

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    What a modern day distopia looks like. Way to go Nebraska, forcing your kids to slave for your owner class at below normal wages, that are already far below average global wages, and now risk life and limb for peanuts. Bet they have a hard time finding workers, eh?!

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m a Republican who LOVES Protecting the Children by Going after Jeffrey Epstein’s Friends! Making schools SAFE! Abolishing Organizations that KIDNAP CHILDREN and take them to Death Camps! Kicking PEDOPHILES out of My Party! Lowering kid’s Pay!

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    I thought age discrimination was not allowed? I guess they assume a bunch of teenagers, many of whom are parents themselves, will be too broke to fight it in court.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nice regression Nebraska, at a time when everything is already too expensive and young people have a small chance to ever buy a house.

    If they don’t want teens working and they don’t want immigrants in the country at all, who is left to do the actual hard work? Let the Nebraska legislature fill in.

  • jcorvera@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    You know what would have prevented this? Higher pay for the Unicam. The 1k/mo salary Legislators get only encourage those who have a primary passive income with nothing to do to set our laws in this state.