• Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    6 个月前

    What’s truly “stunning” is that so many people actually thought he was going to better on the economy, in the first place.

      • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        6 个月前

        A guy I work with actually cited that as proof that he was smart, since he actually walked away free and clear after making a ton of money off the deal. Apparently, even bankruptcies are considered “successful” now.

        • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          6 个月前

          And that guy almost gets it… trump is successful at burning everyone else and walking away with the money. Which is exactly what he’s doing with the presidency.

          He isn’t a successful businessman, he is a successful conman. Idiots can’t tell the difference.

          • Deacon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 个月前

            He is making the classic mistake of thinking that he would be Trump in this scenario, and not the casino employee who lost their job

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 个月前

          LOL, dumbass donnie talked about low gas prices before he came into office the second time and just a few days ago said high gas prices will make us a lot of money.

          Consistency is not really something that conservatives do…

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 个月前

      “But Joe Biden used american oil reserves to lower gas prices!”

      • that was a real argument with me
    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 个月前

      Guess they were not watching him in the first term, LOL.

      But then, they don’t really look at how W handled things, either.

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 个月前

        Trumps first term got saved by Jerome Powell. Economy wise he didn’t do anywhere near as much damage as this time around. On top of handing out covid checks and printing money like crazy people think he did an ok job even though JPow was holding the economy together with scotch tape.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 个月前

          That’s the irony, isn’t it? The bumbling fool would have been even worse off if it wasn’t for the guy he’s trying to have investigated for bullshit reasons.

          Did he even say thank you once? Where is James Bowman when Donvict could really use him?

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 个月前

      It was a race to the bottom to see who could be shittier.

      Actually, I guess it was a race to the top; which party can siphon the most out of the American public and send it to the top (i.e. billionaires).

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 个月前

      Even more stunning is how many people think the midterms are either going to be A. Honest and free or B. Change a goddamn thing

      • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 个月前

        Midterms, like all elections, are run by the states. The states will be sending their elected leaders to Washington next year. I’m confident that the midterms in my state will be honest and free.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 个月前

          Not if the SAVE act passes. It breezed through the House. It might not make it through the Senate, but if it does, that one act will federalize elections, in addition to disenfranchising almost every married woman in the country.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 个月前

        What are you looking to change? Really the best we can hope for is stalemate. If democrats gain enough seats, cons won’t be able to pass more damaging bills nor rubberststamp donvict. Hopefully we’ll see resistance to donvicts evasion of constitutional checks and balances.

        But given the partisan divide and dysfunctional Congress , without the white house and a filibuster-proof majority, there’s not much hope for starting the recovery

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 个月前

      There are non-voters, and people who won’t admit they’re Republican.

      Ain’t that the truth. Most especially that last part.

      They are more properly called reactionary centrists. And boy, do they looooove Murc’s Law. That’s the tell.

  • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 个月前

    and said there’s “no way” Republicans can win under these circumstances

    Democratic leadership: Hold my beer

    • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 个月前

      We’ve got Bebee netanyahooos kid to lead the party. We are announcing Israel as the 51st state. We also hired a pedophile cabinet to better reach across the isle.

      Charlie kirks cadaver as vp

  • Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 个月前

    This is why there will be a false flag attack on US soil and elections get “postponed”.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 个月前

      There is no precedent of postponing elections in the U.S. There were elections even during the American Civil War.

      Of course precedent doesn’t seem to mean a fucking thing these days.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 个月前

        There was “no precedent” before for a a LOT of things that are currently happening right now. Precedent isn’t going to save us.

      • Bakkoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 个月前

        All that means is it’s yet to be set. That’s it. No one’s done it yet. Keep relying on laws and an old piece of paper to protect the US and there will be plenty of new precedents.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 个月前

      There have been examples of postponements of elections for emergencies (most notably, the mayoral primaries in New York scheduled on September 11, 2001 had to be postponed for 14 days later), I’m not aware of any instance of an actual changing of swear-in dates being postponed.

      Fuckery can still happen, but I’m more worried about threats and governmental terrorism that suppresses votes on the election day that moves forward as scheduled rather than actually moving the election schedule itself.

    • Oodlenoodlenoo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 个月前

      If elections ever get postponed/canceled I’m following Lincoln’s advice and saying whatever country attacked us has won whatever war they were fighting