“Would you like to see your future living room with beige painted walls? Before I hit send on this prompt I just gotta ask. Do you want to see what it would look like with beige painted walls and Steve Buscemi taking a dump on a glass coffee table? I know a guy who sells glass coffee tables about three blocks from there. Free delivery on orders over forty dollars. Mention my name and he’ll throw in two years worth of glass cleaning supplies.”
![[US] New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is apparently planning to enforce the disclosure of AI-generated images in house listings](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8996a1e4-a7e4-4219-8abb-7bada479a0f5.png){kind=link}
They would argue is a 1st amendment violation
AI has no personhood.
Neither does paper.
Pretty sure false advertising isn’t protected speech, and if it is, what the fucking hell, America?
Would it stand up in court, though?
6/3 Supreme Court ruling that AI pictures are free speech.
Advertising is still advertising and they’re misrepresenting the product
“Would you like to see your future living room with beige painted walls? Before I hit send on this prompt I just gotta ask. Do you want to see what it would look like with beige painted walls and Steve Buscemi taking a dump on a glass coffee table? I know a guy who sells glass coffee tables about three blocks from there. Free delivery on orders over forty dollars. Mention my name and he’ll throw in two years worth of glass cleaning supplies.”
A court already defined AI generated CSAM as free speech so I wouldn’t be surprised