Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoHappy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square149fedilinkarrow-up1926arrow-down144
arrow-up1882arrow-down1imageHappy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!lemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square149fedilink
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·8 hours agoVibes based statistics
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·8 hours agoWhy do you avoid answering to the comment with fact in it ? https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·8 hours agoWhy do you keep resorting to lazy personal attacks?
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-28 hours agoBecause you keep choosing to answer weak arguments. Just to precise, in what was it a perosnnal attack ?
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·8 hours agoAnd you keep choosing to resort to lazy personal attacks. And you know which ones are personal attacks, don’t play dumb
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·8 hours agoHo I am 100% convinced your a paid troll, sorry if it hurt you. But you still avoid answering.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·8 hours agoIf that was true you wouldn’t keep replying. You know I’m not, you’re just using it as a personal attack
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·8 hours agoLol no because I love to play with troll. I you were not I would have let it go since long before. Since your paid you should work
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·7 hours agoDid that even make sense in your head?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·8 hours agoNo. I looked at different testimonials and believe this estimation is safer and closer to a potential reality.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·8 hours agoAnd those would be?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·8 hours agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre - Death toll section I believe I checked the numbers at the French page some time ago, and based on the diversity of reports and their background, I personally believed that it was around 500. I do get that people can estimate a bit more or a bit less though.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·8 hours agoSo Wikipedia is what convinced you?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·8 hours agoWikipedia is a community-driven encyclopedia based on sources. All claims include a source. What do you want more? Those articles being on a controversial topic, have been moderated and are pretty well done in my opinion.
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-28 hours agoYou should ask him about this : https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421 Seem to be too much for him.
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·8 hours agoWe got it. They’re avoiding to answer or acknowledge your comment.
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-27 hours agoNot my comment though. And he answer and acknowledged my comment fine. But not this one I wonder why. Edit : typo
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·7 hours agoSo it was Wikipedia that convinced you?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·7 hours agoI was convinced something happened way before this, but for the number of deaths, yes, that was my source.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·6 hours agoOk. They’d fail you for that in highschool
Vibes based statistics
Why do you avoid answering to the comment with fact in it ? https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421
Why do you keep resorting to lazy personal attacks?
Because you keep choosing to answer weak arguments. Just to precise, in what was it a perosnnal attack ?
And you keep choosing to resort to lazy personal attacks. And you know which ones are personal attacks, don’t play dumb
Ho I am 100% convinced your a paid troll, sorry if it hurt you. But you still avoid answering.
If that was true you wouldn’t keep replying. You know I’m not, you’re just using it as a personal attack
Lol no because I love to play with troll. I you were not I would have let it go since long before. Since your paid you should work
Did that even make sense in your head?
No. I looked at different testimonials and believe this estimation is safer and closer to a potential reality.
And those would be?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre - Death toll section
I believe I checked the numbers at the French page some time ago, and based on the diversity of reports and their background, I personally believed that it was around 500. I do get that people can estimate a bit more or a bit less though.
So Wikipedia is what convinced you?
Wikipedia is a community-driven encyclopedia based on sources. All claims include a source.
What do you want more?
Those articles being on a controversial topic, have been moderated and are pretty well done in my opinion.
You should ask him about this : https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421 Seem to be too much for him.
We got it. They’re avoiding to answer or acknowledge your comment.
Not my comment though. And he answer and acknowledged my comment fine. But not this one I wonder why. Edit : typo
So it was Wikipedia that convinced you?
I was convinced something happened way before this, but for the number of deaths, yes, that was my source.
Ok. They’d fail you for that in highschool