• Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        There is no nuance.

        Rape means no consent was granted. We need communication to receive consent. We cannot communicate with cows.

        You’re a shill for the dairy industry. You drink rape milk

          • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Does the door bleed when you do that? Does it cry out in fear of rape, or of sadness of losing its child right after birth?

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              the issue was consent. are you conceding that consent is absurd from something that we cannot communicate with?

              • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Animals can communicate with others in their species, meaning that they can obtain and give consent to others of their species. Just because humans cannot communicate with other non-human animals does not mean that the idea of consent is invalid or absurd.

                The fact remains: we cannot receive consent from animals should we want to violate their bodily autonomy. It is always morally unjust to do this. The same is true when people neuter or spay their pets. Humans do this for their own benefit, to avoid behaviors in animals that occur if nothing is done, since not doing so would be inconvenient.