I came across a post requesting to remove Nutomic from the Lemmy devs due to a comment he made here. In it, he suggests that the ruling class promotes both LGBTQ+ rights and transphobia as a means to create division among the working class. I’m curious to hear your thoughts on this perspective. Do you agree or disagree with his viewpoint? What other topics do you believe are used to divide the working class? Let’s discuss!

  • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Personally, I think all of this “Person X holds an officially wrong viewpoint on this one singular issue, so let’s attack them and create as much division as possible and take energy away from defending ourselves against people who hold objectively wrong and dangerous viewpoints on 100% of the issues and are actively trying to destroy us” thing is silly. But that is me.

    The Lemmy devs are a little bit unusual in that I have problems with their overall politics (even if we actually agree on more than we disagree, probably), not just a one issue. But even in that case, where it’s a sizeable difference of opinion (instead of WE CAUGHT THEM BEING BAD ON THIS ONE ISSUE FUCK EM FUCK EM FUCK EM), I don’t think should be a reason to “divide” from them. People are allowed to hold viewpoints, even allowed to contribute while holding those viewpoints, even if I think they are wrong.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I feel like this is the best approach. An ally is an ally. If they have weird, socially unacceptable, or poorly thought out ideas, but they

      1. aren’t acting on them,
      2. don’t promote them,
      3. still act in good faith on issues we have in common,

      then they’re fine for the stuff we care about. The right has built a big tent because they understand this. We’re only holding ourselves back by subjecting each other to purity tests.

      As always, there are limits, but generally we need to build more coalitions.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree with this. The liberal side has been for too long carving ourselves into “Holier than thou” people of who can be the most accepting. It creates a backfire that while you yourself are going for who can be the most accepting, they push away people who may just have one small idea that may need to be tweaked or altered. The problem is that it’s much easier to push them away rather than invest time in understanding their viewpoint and asking them why they believe that. So they push away potential allies, and look right there the conservative movement has their arms wide open. “We don’t think you’re whatever-phobic or racist, you’re welcome here, look we’re all good people too!”. And the right grows.

        We tell Laura that she’s not welcome because she’s unsure if she should accept dragon-kin as a true gender ideology rather than just saying “That’s okay, we’ll chat about it”, so instead she goes to the right who says “Oh you’re not crazy at all, they’re crazy!”

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I don’t want to exile them per se but I do have a huge problem with the way they manage their instance, and I think a boycott of that instance has become the only reasonable way to respond to their abuses of power.

      If they ever stop being thought police then we can reconnect. It’s not their politics or views that are the problem, it’s their behavior. Even though, yes, I also think their politics are extremely toxic.

      • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hm… yeah. I mostly agree. Or sort of almost agree. This one issue of Nutomic having an offically incorrect stance on trans issues is one thing, and then their wider pro-authoritarian politics is another, and then the way they manage their instance is another. They are related but separate.

        In terms of a response to the third thing, I do agree about a “boycott” meaning not posting new stuff to lemmy.ml communities in general and just preferring communities in more human-rights-respecting instances. I don’t think that blocking the instance, or not commenting on their stuff at all and having isolation, is a good way, though. The thing is that that isolation just helps their censorship to be effective. That’s part of the point of the fanatical way they attack outsiders and try to curate a narrative for their users, and it’s really very effective. If you ever look from inside lemmy.ml, it looks like they all make sense and there is consensus, and we’re the weird ones. One way to tear down that veil is to have open communication, and people from the outside coming in and saying normal things, and then they have to continuously have that fanatical response or else have the mods intervene (and then we can talk about how the mods are overreaching and it’s pretty clear who is talking sense about it, over time). Talking to each other is good. I feel like if all the not-pro-Russian people just self censor themselves from lemmy.ml, because they know the mods are going to go HAM on their comments, then it sort of does their job for them and makes it actually airtight, more so that it would be otherwise. That’s what they would want to see happen.

        One related thing which bugs me more than it seems to bug a lot of people: I think it’s a problem that they are so overtly aligned with these malicious actors, and then also they are producing and packaging software that all of us use that is designated for this important purpose. Like if if was an Israeli software development team putting together a new federated web site that all of us were going to trust our communication to, and their home instance was all pro-Israel stuff and you could get banned for criticizing Israel, that would be insane for us to trust the software and the core instance. I mean yeah it’s open source but also, the people controlling all of it are super-green with these people that like to do corruptions to software and sneaky things in the Western media sphere. That would bug me. That’s kind of how I look at the Lemmy devs, and why for example I reacted so strongly when the docs had that “mistake” that would send new Lemmy installs’ admin passwords to lemmy.ml by default. I feel like that aspect of it is also something that should get thought about more often, it is why I am in favor of Piefed even if reimplementing the whole thing from the ground up is this massive amount of duplicative work.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think you’re underestimating the censorship over there. I agree open communication is good and I used to comment over there a lot—during the initial Reddit migration in 2023 they couldn’t stay on top of it all, or maybe they were more permissive back then. But it all got removed eventually and I got banned even after deciding I should avoid overtly political topics. It’s bad and it’s a waste of time to even try to engage there. Better to wait for their users to come here to educate them, futile though it might be.

          I didn’t hear about this “mistake” but I agree it’s problematic and hope my instance eventually moves to piefed. Though I haven’t tried it so I don’t know how well I’ll like it.

          On the other hand, I do feel like the ideology of the standard corporate media platforms is about as bad as the tankies and we don’t flip out about that. Makes me wonder about double standards here.

          • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I didn’t hear about this “mistake” but I agree it’s problematic and hope my instance eventually moves to piefed. Though I haven’t tried it so I don’t know how well I’ll like it.

            https://lemmy.world/post/32838609

            It was interesting.

            On the other hand, I do feel like the ideology of the standard corporate media platforms is about as bad as the tankies and we don’t flip out about that. Makes me wonder about double standards here.

            Yeah, pretty much. I realized that my Israel analogy wasn’t even completely on point. It would be more along the lines of someone writing the software who was all cool with Palantir and ICE, and constantly spoke highly of them. That’s about the level that I put the Russian government on (which of course isn’t to excuse any of the horror of what the US government is currently trying to do; if anything, it goes the other way and throws into relief the horror that Russia has already been for decades now that has been normalized at this point.) And, of course, all our existing corporate social media is okay with Palantir and ICE, they just have more sense than to talk out loud about it.

            • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah they are generally quieter. But we all know where they stand. However, I find it much more difficult to sever myself from them since everyone uses them.