Calling the depiction of a woman in the image a she is fine. The image is clearly depicting a woman.
Saying “she earned” in regard to knuckleheads clicking on an AI audio collection is incorrect in two ways: the audio files did not come from a she, and there was no earning involved. An audio LLM is unrelated to a depiction of a woman in an image, and cannot earn anything.
Thanks. You explained the misunderstanding in my comment that the comment you’re replying to missed.
I missed this misunderstanding and went off on an unhinged rant I deleted. Should have recognized that they were talking about images and I was referring to the context you referred to.
Calling an AI “she” is giving a different degree of humanity than what we refer to with “her” when talking about the artist portrayal of a woman.
It’s like calling the algorithm that generated a picture of a women “she” vs. calling the women IN the image “she”.
I missed this misunderstanding and you clarified it perfectly.
Maybe, but I think it’s still pretty grey this thread is clouded by people’s opinions about AI rather than what’s the best way to communicate about something.
“<The cartoon character> was great last season. She really won people’s hearts”
Calling the depiction of a woman in the image a she is fine. The image is clearly depicting a woman.
Saying “she earned” in regard to knuckleheads clicking on an AI audio collection is incorrect in two ways: the audio files did not come from a she, and there was no earning involved. An audio LLM is unrelated to a depiction of a woman in an image, and cannot earn anything.
Thanks. You explained the misunderstanding in my comment that the comment you’re replying to missed.
I missed this misunderstanding and went off on an unhinged rant I deleted. Should have recognized that they were talking about images and I was referring to the context you referred to.
Calling an AI “she” is giving a different degree of humanity than what we refer to with “her” when talking about the artist portrayal of a woman.
It’s like calling the algorithm that generated a picture of a women “she” vs. calling the women IN the image “she”.
I missed this misunderstanding and you clarified it perfectly.
Maybe, but I think it’s still pretty grey this thread is clouded by people’s opinions about AI rather than what’s the best way to communicate about something.
“<The cartoon character> was great last season. She really won people’s hearts”