God this is just fucking insane. Grok can’t go three sentences without reminding everyone why gender ideology is problematic or whatever. It’s also strangely inconsistent with pronouns.

This paragraph of slop is jaw-droppingly incomprehesible:

In January 2017, Jenner underwent gender confirmation surgery (vaginoplasty), a procedure she had contemplated but delayed until post-announcement, as detailed in her 2024 memoir The Secrets of My Life.[96] These steps comprised the core of the medical transition, involving irreversible alterations to secondary sex characteristics while leaving primary biological male structures—such as XY chromosomes and original genitalia—unmodified until the final surgery.[96]

And it randomly inserts this medical advice into the article:

Biologically, HRT in male-to-female transitions like Jenner’s carries documented risks, including elevated incidence of venous thromboembolism, stroke, and cardiovascular events due to estrogen’s prothrombotic effects, particularly in older individuals initiating therapy after age 65.

Like… okay, even if this is true, why and how is this actually relevant to an article on Caitlyn Jenner? It’s such a transparent attempt by Musk to insert his political views wherever they’re tangentially related.

These interventions approximate but do not replicate female reproductive biology, such as menstruation or gestation, underscoring that transition modifies phenotype without conferring the immutable reproductive dimorphism central to biological sex distinctions.

I’m sorry – what intervention approximates (but does not replicate) menstruation or gestation? Also, how on earth can a procedure “underscore” something? This isn’t literary analysis.