Plex has confirmed that it will require a Remote Watch Pass or Plex Pass for remote streaming on its TV apps. The change is going into effect for the Roku app first, followed by all other TV apps and third-party clients in 2026.

Earlier this year, Plex increased its pricing for Plex Pass and stopped supporting all options for free remote streaming in the Plex apps, such as adding a custom server connection in the app settings. The company said at the time, “The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature.” That’s also when Plex introduced the Remote Watch Pass as a less expensive way to enable remote streaming again.

Plex is now rolling out the remote watch changes to its Roku TV app. If you have Plex Pass, or the owner of the server you’re streaming from has Plex Pass, you don’t need to do anything. Otherwise, if you are streaming on a different network from the server’s home network, you need Plex Pass or Remote Watch Pass.

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Fuuuuuck plex

    For the past like 5-7 years I’ve said consistently that the second plex took VC money the writing was on the wall and that they would eventually and consistently take actions hostile towards their consumers and doing what they can to both move to SaaS and alienate lifetime pass users as well as distance themselves from their core purpose of sharing collections of pirated media hidden behind the thinly veneered “for tobacco use only” bullshit of “actually you can just rip your own physical media”

    Every time I post, whether it’s banning the ability to serve on hetzner, putting ads all over the app and starting to collect data, increasing monetization, etc and talk about how it’s inherently going to continue getting worse plex users inevitably come out of the woodwork to be like “well this is overblown, plex is so good it’s worth getting fucked, jellyfin is slightly harder since it’s not backed by 40 million dollars of devil money that demands endless growth until the product is ruined”

    As long as those people who are willing to get walked all over exist, that demand a slightly easier existence over one that serves them, every product and service will continue to get worse and worse while a small group of people get fat off of endless subscriptions

    • BoblinTheGoblin [none/use any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Unfortunately Jellyfin still has issues, I was trying the latest version earlier, a movie I was watching started skipping on jellyfin, worked fine on Plex. I also looked at moving over watching stuff with friends to jellyfin, we tried the syncplay feature, it kept stuttering and stopping (auto match was off, as default), and we just gave up after a minute or two and just went back to Plex.

      I want to like jellyfin, and the latest releases have improved a lot of the performance issues I used to have, but man is it hard to love moving to it. Sure foss and there’s lots of cool plugins, but everything else has just been a worse experience for me.

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, like I said, you have to do some work with FOSS.

        Check logs, reach out to support forums, etc.

        Alternatively have something that is more likely to “just work” at the cost of data collection and profiling and increasingly restrictive software licensing designed to drive you towards service delivery license models (eg monthly payments), at a minimum

        is plex more mature? Yes of course, it has had injections of over 40 million dollars of devil money plus whatever they’ve raised from you. Jellyfin would likely catch up significantly with such funding, but remember that such funding always comes with obligations that compromise the product and fuck over the community that actually cares about usability and core features (see: Reddit, MySpace, Facebook, amazon, Google and every Google product, Netflix, etc etc etc etc etc)

    • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Reposting something from r/Plex because the mods are bitch-babies with minimal changes:

      If you pay money for something, you do not own it. It is not entirely yours.

      You pay, that shit’s proprietary, you didnt make it, you can’t see the insides. Why would any self respecting sociopath give you something without including a backdoor, data logging/tracking, and a string to pull it back?

      You steal something, or download more anonymously, it isn’t immediately connected to you, it may not have the backdoors activated, and you probably cut that string when you acquired it. You might even have to fuck around in the guts and modify shit so it can’t be remotely bricked tracked etc.

      Applies to physical goods up to and including housing too. The state wants me out, I’m out. Can happen for a lot of reasons, and no amount of obedience or investment keeps you 100% safe. In a squat, ive already defended myself, proven their power, at least what they’re willing to exercise, cannot dislodge me. The place is truly mine.

      You buy from the company store, you don’t own shit.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I was wondering how long before they dropped that other shoe.

    I bought Plexpass when it was $70. Got my money out of it. The centralized login, ssl, caching and proxy are probably worth paying something for.

    That said, I’ve mostly walked away from them over privacy concerns and an utter refusal to add community-requested features while removing actively used features.

    • FlembleFabber@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Me too buddy, me too. Not gonna lie it took quite a lot of effort to get everything setup and stuff but reading news like this now gives me a cozy warm feeling

      • LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’m curious on what more setup you’ve done? Mine has been pretty easy, but I haven’t done too much other than just watch stuff

        • FlembleFabber@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I didn’t get remote control to work how I wanted, I can do it only using a VPN on my home network which is fine. Other than that I had some issues getting it to recognise all my shows and download the metadata. But I like the customization and potential to add extra add ons and stuff

        • rami@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          I have the sevre side stuff all set up as far as I know but I’ve not been able to get the Roku app to connect. I should note the tv is literally on the other side of the wall from my computer, they’re on the same network.

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I regret buying a Plex pass years ago when the project was still pretty good. I wanted to support the devs, but now I hope that they continue to develop this shit app so they don’t move on to ruin things like Jellyfin.

  • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’m sticking with plex personally. I have a lifetime plex pass already so no one else needs a pass to stream from my server. Aka, this changes nothing for me or my users.

    • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 hours ago

      for now. I feel like it’s only a matter of time before they say those lifetime passes are expired, or that the product has changes so much it’s not valid, etc. they’ve proven they don’t really care about the user base anymore, it’s all about the money for them now unfortunately.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        They care about their users but who those users are has shifted. They make more money off of FASS so that is who they care about.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This is total “fuck you, got mine” energy. You’re part of the problem. As somebody else who owns a Plex pass, I’m done with their bullshit. I downloaded Plex as a way to serve my content to my devices. These morons lost their way a while ago and became a dump, and clearly it’s not getting any better.

      Hopefully this latest big-brain move of theirs drives more users off their shit platform to one that’s better.

      But you have a Plex pass, so I’m sure it won’t affect you when the money disappears and the company folds lol.

      • rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        I mean, if you already have a lifetime pass, it’s not like you’re giving them anymore money or supporting them from here on out. Not sure how that’s “fuck you, got mine.” Who exactly is being fucked here? It would make more sense if Plex had a limited number of passes that people hoarded early on like boomers with property. In this case the financial side of things is already a done deal, and doesn’t somehow deprive others of a resource.

        • brax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          You’re saying you bought a pass, fuck all the people that didn’t buy a pass. Sure other people could buy a pass, but why would you want to encourage them to do that and incentivize the further enshitifcaiton of Plex?

          • rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I don’t think OP said literally any of that, so I’m confused. OP already has a lifetime Plex pass, so OP is sticking with plex, since as the server owner, a plex pass covers everyone streaming from their server.

            I’m still not sure who’s being fucked in the context of what OP wrote. Either way, nothing OP is doing is financially supporting Plex, because that ship already sailed back when they bought a lifetime pass.

            • brax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I’ve been using Plex form 2009-2010 and have watched it slowly enshitify. The purpose of the software was to allow people to host their own media server and making it accessible anywhere. The pass was a nice way to thank the devs and get some small perks. Now it seems like they are yet again stripping features from basic users.

              The op’s stance of “I have a pass so it doesn’t affect me” is further supporting and encouraging the enshitifcaiton of what used to be a good service for anybody. Jellyfin seems to be the way to go now.

              • rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                What would you like OP to do? Nothing they’re doing is helping or hurting Plex. Nor is it helping or hurting anyone else.

                Plex is enshittifying. I’m not sure how much they care about the opinions of Lifetime Pass users, or particularly care whether those people continue to use the service, at least when it comes to streaming personal media libraries.

                For example, Windows is thoroughly enshittified, but I’m not going to tell users of Win 10 that they need to switch away right now, or that they’re bad people for continuing to use an old product they previously paid for. Just that they should jump ship whenever they’re ready to move on from Win 10.

      • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        See, I don’t understand that at all from you. How have they lost their way exactly? Th9jga that you can turn off in settings piss9ng you off? Are you unable to stream your content with your plex pass that you already own? Can others not stream from you? Does your content Metadata not scrape properly? Explain you comment because it seems like you’re part of the problem hating them for the sake of hating them. Getting “on the train” of hate as it were.

        • brax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I don’t care about my Plex pass, I care about the basic service getting shit on. The pass was never meant to give me a premium product, it was meant to support the devs and give me a few minor feature perks.

          I’ve used Plex since 2009-2010. I’ve watched it change into the trash it is becoming. People should trash it and move to Jellyfin.

          • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Again, what do you find trash? Every core feature i need works perfectly fine with plex.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Switched to Jellyfin after more than a decade with Plex. Prettey… prettey… pretty good.

    • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Love me some Jellyfin. I was yesterday days old when I finally read some documentation and learned that my metadata issues were because I was using a mixed library type for kids shoes and movies, and that they strongly discourage it because of the unreliable metadata it causes. Split kids movies and shows apart and now that works flawlessly, still, I feel like I’d prefer they could be combined on a single library for a kids’ browsing

    • dajoho@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can recommend a local Wireguard server for this. I have one port on my router open for Wireguard and all of my devices can connect to it remotely.

      Once connected, they can see all the devices on my local network, including my local jellyfin server. It works pretty painlessly and you don’t need to open any jellyfin ports to the world.

        • dajoho@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Haven’t personally the need to connect tv boxes remotely- all of my mobile devices are handheld, so cell phone, laptop, steamdeck etc, all of which have pretty seamless wireguard clients, but I don’t see a reason why it wouldn’t work with the correct Wireguard client installed on a tv box. The only issue might be really old android versions.

          • kratoz29@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            The bandwidth is not enough for big media files, at least that’s what I’ve discovered.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s how it works with Tailscale as well. Tailscale creates Wireguard tunnels underneath between the different devices. There’s also an open-source self-hostable Tailscale control plane.

      • Bongles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        There’s a few ways, but it’s similar to hosting anything yourself. You could, if you’re not too bothered by it, just forward the port that jellyfin is using. You do this in your routers settings and you can see/change the port in jellyfins settings. Then you give your friends the device that’s hosting jellyfin’s ip address and they type it in when logging into the app. That’s simple and quick and not secure at all. But it’s really one of those things that 99 times out of 100 it’s fine.

        You can use something like tailscale to connect your friends devices to your network, I didn’t do it so I don’t really know the details, but you’d need it installed on all of their clients. This is (probably) the most secure way but it’s a pain in the butt for users, compared to other ways. https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/post-install/networking/tailscale/

        I ended up using nginx as a reverse proxy, and bought a domain name so I could just tell people “go into jellyfin wherever you want and type in domain.com, then pick the profile I made you.” I was really new to this nginx thing when I did it, so I don’t have a deep understanding of why it’s better than just forwarding the port but it is.

          • Bongles@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Yeah, plex handles all that nonsense on their end. That’s why before their recent shenanigans they were a great option.

    • Loaf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same, and I haven’t missed any of the streaming services I used to have. It’s amazing.

        • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Do you reverse proxy, Tailscale, etc to authenticate or circumvent the need for a secure connection? Every time I come close to planning a switch, that part paralyzes me, it feels so unintuitive.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I do use both a reverse proxy and Tailscale. All services are proxied. All services except for Jellyfin are accessed only via Tailscale. Jellyfin is publicly available. I’ve obscured it a bit by setting up long, randomly generated DNS name. The proxy would only forward traffic to Jellyfin if the request comes from that exact DNS name. Bots would have to know this name for the proxy to entertain their attempts at all. Then every user has long, randomly-generated password. I prefer to only use it behind Tailscale but some of my family needs direct access. Also Chromecast.

            • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I get that some users need a DNS name, but for Chromecast (unless you’re talking about the original one that does not actually have apps) you can use Tailscale just like in any android device.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Its a major rewrite, which is bringing a lot of problems like library scans that last dozens of hours, massive CPU use on idle, broken playback, and much much more

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      They make more money off of FAST then they do self hosting own media. Of course they are going to care less and less about the self hosters.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        The issue, as always, is that Plex started to put free existing features behind a paywall to squeeze more money out of their client base instead of adding something and charging for it.

        VC money came in and now the VC wants to cash in on the investment.

      • earthworm@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t think that’s it.

        There were complaints when Netflix started enforcing password sharing rules.

        I think the main driver of complaints is “you promised the thing I’m paying for would be X, and now you’re changing the deal.”

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          There was never an explicit deal on providing free shit. Although they seem to be honoring paid stuff. If your account is old enough, content shared with friends can be downloaded even if they don’t have a Plex pass.

          • earthworm@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Not for users who paid the mobile unlock fee.

            What if I’ve already paid the one-time mobile app activation fee?
            For users who have already paid a one-time, in-app activation for either our mobile Android or iOS app, an extended trial for the new Remote Watch Pass subscription is available.
            (Source: Plex)

            They soften the landing with the “extended trial”, but anyone who paid the “one-time fee” is finding out what that really meant.

            I wouldn’t be surprised if a year from now there’s an announcement for Plex 2.0 and my lifetime account only applies to legacy Plex.

      • fin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        In that case, I think no one would’ve used Plex in the first place. But yeah, I think it should be that way ideally.

  • swearengen@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Switched my users to Jellyfin this spring when Plex first announced this move, pretty seamless transition.

    I actually prefer Jellyfin and it’s UI compared to the new one Plex rolled out on Roku, what a mess that is to navigate now.

      • swearengen@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I only had a few users and a couple of TBs so I did it manually, only took an hour or so but there are ways to automate it.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        You probably could do it with trakt.
        The plugin supports syncing watched history.

        But you’d need to do it for every user individually.
        (Not tested. But at the time had issues with weird watch status in my jellyfin and trakt seemed to be the reason)

  • Asweet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I tried setting up Jellyfin a while ago, but ran into a lot of difficulties with TV show matching. Plex is a lot better at grabbing a pack of loosely organized files and understanding episode structure without renaming or moving files, which is great for continuing to seed files that are in the library.

    I haven’t seen anyone discuss this, so maybe I’m doing something wrong? If not, this is the one major blocker that I have before rolling it out Jellyfin as an alternative to the people I’ve shared my plex server with.

    Really want that in place because the writing seems to be on the wall (in flashing neon) about the direction Plex is going

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Plex is a lot better at grabbing a pack of loosely organized files and understanding episode structure without renaming or moving files, which is great for continuing to seed files that are in the library.

      You may want to look into the *arr suite. Sonarr for managing TV show downloads, Radarr for managing movie downloads, Jellyseerr for managing media requests, Prowlarr for managing torrent/usenet indexers (search engines), Cleanuparr for automatic download management, and Huntarr for automatic downloads.

      I haven’t seen anyone discuss this, so maybe I’m doing something wrong?

      The go-to these days is to use hardlinks, which will allow you to have the files show up in two places at once. Sort of like a shortcut, but it actually shows the true file instead of simply pointing to a different file location. One stays in your torrent’s location for seeding, and a second hardlink is created in your media folder, with proper naming structure for Plex/Jellyfin to find. The *arr suite automates that process. It tracks your downloads, and automatically creates Plex/Jellyfin file names in the corresponding library folders when the download is completed.

      It’s the best in every sense:

      • You can continue seeding.
      • You don’t need to keep multiple copies of the same file, because the hardlink in your library folder is pointing to the same file as the torrent. So it doesn’t take up twice as much space on your drive.
      • You get proper naming conventions for your media discovery.
      • You don’t need to manually manage your library.

      The big downside to hardlinks is that they can’t be used across drives or partitions. The hardlink can only point to a file on the same drive. So if your torrent download folder is on a different drive than your library folders, you can’t use hardlinks.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yeah, I guess I should have been more clear. Hardlinks also work for things like RAID drives. But if your PC has a C:/ and D:/ drive, you can’t hardlink across the two.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I got around that by being a bad pirate. If I’ve watched it, chances are I’m nuking it in a few days from my download drive to make room for something else.

    • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      if the hard links everyone else is mentionining aren’t feasible for you, take a look at tvnamer. I’ve found it works quite well for scanning and renaming files, it even supports custom renaming pattern and you can pass it a tvdb series id if it doesn’t automatically detect your series.

      I use it cause all my torrenting is done on a different machine, and those files get transferred over to my server. so the arr suite isn’t the best solution for me

    • Bongles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I ended up using tiny media manager to move and rename all of my files. Fixes that issue.

    • dmention7@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It took me awhile to figure out the correct setup to get Sonarr, qbittorrent, and Jellyfin all to play nicely together, but once you get it figured out, it transparently addresses the problems of folder structure and allowing you to keep seeding content.

      I had the same issue as you, initially, where I had to do a ton of library maintenance in Jellyfin. But since using Sonarr to monitor and import media from torrents to a structured media library, Jellyfin has been pretty hands-off

    • bowreality@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I have the same problem. There is a Lemmy community for Jellyfin. Maybe we need to ask there. I run both right now. Plex and Jellyfin. I use Jellyfin whenever I can but still have plex for that issue

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      I think it’s a common practice to keep the original file in the torrent folder and create a hard link with proper naming in the media folder.

    • cm0002@toast.oooOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Well if you want to continue with torrents, use Sonarr configured to torrent and configure it to move files by linking instead of moving

      But I would HIGHLY recommend you switch to usenet for your source. You do have to have one or a couple cheap (talking 9-20$ a YEAR) indexer subscriptions and a subscription to a usenet provider itself (7-30$/month) but it’s SO much faster, easier and you don’t need to worry about seeding.

  • bonenode@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Cue all the users with lifetime passes not seeing that this is slowly becoming a problem…

    • excursion22@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I have a lifetime pass and switched to Jellyfin years ago. Plex shoving their streaming content down my throat while putting my local libraries in the most tedious spots to access in the menus was a very quick turn off.

    • turdas@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Abandoning streaming services only to become a serf of another commercial subscription service seems like such a bizarre move that I really don’t understand how Plex users even exist.

      • kieron115@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I bought a lifetime pass for 100 bucks about 10 years ago, and have had 10 years of not having to give a shit about these announcements. I’ve saved well over 100 bucks on streaming services in that time. Worth it 1000%.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wow, could you get any more condescending? We bought a product (10+ years ago in my case) and it still works great. Why would I switch to an inferior service, just because the FREE version of the product I already bought got worse?

        This has no impact on anyone that actually paid for Plex.

        With this move the free version of Plex got downgraded, to now have feature parity with Jellyfin. Meaning a VPN is required if you want to access your media on the go

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Privacy for me. When they where sending out emails about what you watched. Kind of made the we don’t know what’s on your server line a lie. So how could I trust them. I still expect a massive sting where they have to tell the MPAA or something who has pirated content and they go after people. Surprised it hasn’t happened yet seems so obvious.

        • turdas@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m not sure if you’re joking or not, but you can remotely stream from Jellyfin without using a VPN.

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            You CAN, but you really shouldn’t. Even the documentation says as much. The Jellyfin server is way to insecure to expose it to the open internet. In reality you can’t safely use Jellyfin remotely without a vpn

              • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                17 hours ago

                Note that opening a port gives full access to that port to the next higher Network. Opening a port directly to the Internet is therefore insecure and not recommended.

                It says so right there.

                There are multiple ways of exposing Jellyfin to the outside - the most common ones are:

                forwarding its Ports directly to the internet (not recommended!)

                forwarding through a Reverse Proxy

                using a VPN connection to enter the Network

                use a VPS to Reverse Proxy to your home network

                And there.

                This smug mentality that security is unnecessary when exposing ports to the open internet reminds me of people who think its fine to drive drunk because “I’ve done it dozens of times before and nothing happened!” It also reminds me of the mentality of tech company VPs right before they have a massive data breach. It’s quite absurd to read.

                • turdas@suppo.fi
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  For some reason they recommend against directly forwarding Jellyfin’s ports, but reverse proxies are fine. I expect this is because the default configuration doesn’t use SSL.

                  This smug mentality that security is unnecessary when exposing ports to the open internet reminds me of people who think its fine to drive drunk because “I’ve done it dozens of times before and nothing happened!” It also reminds me of the mentality of tech company VPs right before they have a massive data breach. It’s quite absurd to read.

                  I think you’ll find without exposing ports to the open internet we would not be having this conversation right now. Which, I suppose, wouldn’t be such a bad thing.

              • brewery@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                23 hours ago

                This is good to know, thanks for sharing. I’ve only got it local for now after installing at the weekend and wasn’t sure how secure it was for external access.

                • Pika@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 hours ago

                  I’m just chiming in to say that while the documentation gives you information on how to do external access, there are multiple issues open on the github about unauthenticated endpoints that if you know what is on the server already, you can confirm that it’s there

                  So I wouldn’t use a standard naming convention because using that knowledge, someone who cares could use common names that could be on the server, followed by common standards of formats they would be in, and be able to confirm it’s their via the end points.

            • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              ‘I paid for this shit, and I will not allow it to be disrespected’. Sounds too much like Microsoft and Google apologists.

            • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Oh no, someone else could possibly play media from my media server, if they have the exact link for it!

              Yea, not ideal, but not exactly the end of the world.

              • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                This seems like a naive viewpoint as you’re exposing your whole network and everything connected to it to the open internet. Just because the port connects to Jellyfin doesnt mean there isn’t some exploit or vulnerability that can allow for greater access. This is media software written by volunteers and offered for free, so I wouldn’t expect Fort Knox security from it just because its FOSS. In fact, they specifically put the onus on the user to do this themselves if they so chose.

                • turdas@suppo.fi
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  I would trust the FOSS software’s actually auditable security any day of the week over the sketchy proprietary solution targeting an extremely niche market.

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 hours ago

              What problems? The ones that everyone keeps posting which are not a big deal. Sure they should get fixed and a lot of them have been.

        • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          This has no impact on anyone that actually paid for Plex.

          Yet.

          They’re going down the pathway to enshittification and very few companies that start down that dark path turn away before they destroy everything good they’d made for everyone, free and paid alike. Maybe that won’t happen here, but from all of the times I’ve seen that same song and dance, I would be finding alternatives to switch to, personally. But, it’s obviously up to you to decide your own comfort level if you want to start now or wait to see how far they go

    • Skunk@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      What do you mean?

      To me the problem would be modifying the lifetime pass or simply removing it (for new customers) in favor of a fucking subscription only.

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I would be very surprised if they don’t go there eventually, and I’d even bet they’ll try at some point to force lifetime pass owners to switch to subscription

        If you ever think you’ve found a corpo that can be trusted, no you haven’t

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I have a lifetime pass and stopped using it. I got my money’s worth over the years. No regrets.

      • brewery@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Same. I finally switched over to jellyfin recently as it was low down on a long list of stuff I want to do, let alone need to do. I feel like I got my worth and if things mess up with jellyfin, I’ve got a temporary backup option to spin up without having to give a single penny more. Fingers crossed, no more of my data either seeing as it’s all uninstalled.

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why? Plex was one of the original self hosted streaming platforms and for a long time was pretty much the only option. We have more options now, and those still on Plex, I imagine, are because they don’t have the time or capacity to perform a migration. So they stick with what they’ve got until it breaks.

      Maybe this will be the one that breaks it.

      I was a Plex holdout until 3 months ago. I wanted off Plex for the last 2 years but just never had the time.

      For those waiting, don’t be like me, it’s easier than you think.

      • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        What was the migration like? I’ve been looking to get off Plex for a while now but like you say, haven’t had the time nor the energy.

        Is it as simple as just installing it and pointing it at my NAS?

        • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Pretty much. Personally, I spun up another VM and had the two running alongside each other for a few weeks. Doing it this way allows you to split the work. First get the base server up and running, do some testing and get familiar, then migrate a client.

          It took more effort to get family to switch their client than it did to do the server.

            • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              I’m just using nginx as a reverse proxy. I’m actually using Emby, which Jellyfin is a fork of. I had issues with Jellyfin playback and wasn’t patient enough to fix at the time, but I’ll try again over xmas.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Same I put off and might still be on it if I didn’t loose my watch history. I figured if I was starting over might as well be with FOSS.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I switched to Jellyfin about 4 years ago, no regrets. If I’m traveling I tunnel into my home server and watch whatever I want. As most of us, I started in Plex because back then I was with Synology (cheapest NAS they had back then). The moment I moved to building and maintaining my own server, I tried JF, liked it from day one, learned to deal with the caveats and fix them (took me a while), and have been on it since then.

      • jazzkoalapaws@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It makes more sense to just use free streaming sites or save videos to a storage drive.

        Plex, like framework, seemed like corporate shite that wannabe nerds fell for to fit in with other wannabes.

        • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I’ve not using a free streaming site for years, but when I did they were bags of shite. Buffering, unavailable, etc. There are apps that aggregate the various sites that try and find a wanted show on multiple sites, but they weren’t much better.

          I see self-hosted streaming as just an extension of your “save videos to a storage drive” option. We are just extending the access of that to where its wanted.