xia@lemmy.sdf.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoIt will be great, they said...lemmy.sdf.orgexternal-linkmessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1606arrow-down1103
arrow-up1503arrow-down1external-linkIt will be great, they said...lemmy.sdf.orgxia@lemmy.sdf.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square92fedilink
minus-squaredependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·20 hours agoI’m not the other person. Try not being so combative dude. Jeez.
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·13 hours agoI can’t see how their reply was combative if yours wasn’t in the first place. Coming out of nowhere to protect AWS’s honour or something?
minus-squarevillage604@adultswim.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 hours agoI mean, the person they initially responded to was being a bit combative too.
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 hours agoYeah fair, kinda funny how implied tone can work when reading things. On my first read, for some reason I took the “skill issue” as more playful but on second read, who knows. Playful banter or a deadly duel of words?
minus-squareMagnum, P.I.@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down8·19 hours agoI know, but you engaged in this conversation to state your point and I am trying to understand how it relates.
I’m not the other person. Try not being so combative dude. Jeez.
I can’t see how their reply was combative if yours wasn’t in the first place. Coming out of nowhere to protect AWS’s honour or something?
I mean, the person they initially responded to was being a bit combative too.
Yeah fair, kinda funny how implied tone can work when reading things. On my first read, for some reason I took the “skill issue” as more playful but on second read, who knows.
Playful banter or a deadly duel of words?
I know, but you engaged in this conversation to state your point and I am trying to understand how it relates.