I remember when I suggested that I shouldn’t learn to write in 1998, because you can just type on the computer, I was laughed at. I was told that at best I’d still need to learn to write, and at worst computers can turn out as a fad due to them requiring electricity to work, they can crash and go bad, etc. Pease note that my dislike of writing was heavily influenced by likely having dyspraxia, and a lot of cheaper pens/pencils being mildly painful to hold.

However, the very same people are now disencouraging anything that the AI is promised to replace. Don’t draw, just use Dall-E. Don’t code, just use ChatGPT. Don’t play music, just use Suno. Don’t make movies, just wait until it can do it good enough. The music one is even often being pushed by those who absolutely despised electronic music for “not requiring any talent, just pressing buttons”, all while AI music is literally what ignorant rock/metal kids thought electronic music production was. Even one person, who criticized me for using amp sims on my PC instead of a wall of tube amplifiers is more favorable than not towards AI music.

I wonder if those who now disencourage art classes in favor of a short lesson on how to prompt an image generator will also disencourage writing due to speech-to-text technologies. Maybe the problem is that they don’t use LLMs, but often a more primitive version of neural networks.

And I’m not 100% against new tools. I even use Neural Amp Modeler, sometimes even two instances with one having a Boss HM-2 response for that Swedish chainsaw tone. But these prompt machines are barely more than toys for real professional work, due to the lack of actual control beyond prompting.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    The AI push is definitely worse, but the second place, in my mind is the whole “smart” (insert mundane home gadget here).

    I’m surprised I didn’t see smart toothpaste or anything.

    • Tinks@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have very much adopted and invested in smart technology and even I am massively annoyed by the fact that EVERYTHING connects to WiFi these days. My dishwasher can supposedly download new wash cycles or some nonsense. It’s obnoxious and it will never know wifi. I just like being able to automate things and make my life easier in simple ways. When I dismiss my alarm in the morning my kitchen lights turn on because the first thing I do is go feed the pets. It helps light up the house a bit during winter when I wake up and I love it. THAT is what smart home technology should be. Not a freakin toaster connecting to WiFi so it can alert you when your toast is done.

      On the topic of smart toothbrushes, I did get given one to test out and it was actually pretty cool. After you finished brushing it would send a map of your mouth and what you brushed in case you missed any spots. The app ended up being a bit buggy so I got rid of it, but I could see how that type of thing could be useful, especially for certain demographics like kids. They had a way to gamify brushing your teeth for kids as well, which is silly, but could also be effective especially for autistic kids.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I have smart stuff too. Even got an oral-b “Io” series of “smart” tooth brush!

        I’m actually not enthusiastic about it at all. I got the oral-b because I knew I have a problem that my brushing isn’t preventing cavities, so I did that in an effort to prevent visits to the dentist. It seems to be working. I just need my teeth fixed so I can not have to see a dentist again for a very long while.

        Aside from that, most of the “smart” stuff in my house is lights. I intentionally do not have “smart” lights where safety is a factor, mainly kitchen/bathroom/basement/garage. I don’t want something, or someone being able to turn the lights off on me while I’m slippery and wet in the shower, at the highest probability of falling and hurting myself; or when I’m cutting up food in the kitchen and not being able to see where the blade is for even a second could result in serious injury; or when I’m working on something in the garage, with potential hazards all around, like tools, oil, fuel, and other dangerous items and products.

        The basement is mostly for when we do any work on the home appliances, wiring or plumbing. Don’t want to be holding a leak with one hand, waving frantically with the other to try to trigger the motion sensor to turn the lights back on…

        Living and sleeping areas, hallways, bedrooms, etc, are all smart lights. They’re mostly RGB so we can do “party mode” or something, if we want… Largely they’re just told to turn on or off, but some household members have found that being able to turn the lights on a specific color for a specific time of day is useful, so the RGB stays. I put in some smart light switches too, some for areas that I don’t care to put in “smart” lights, one notable example is the outdoor/porch lights, I have it set up on a timer to turn on/off with the sunset/sunrise, that way I can use cheap, throw away LED lightbulbs around the outside of the house and if they get damaged or destroyed by weather or vandals, I basically don’t care… Not that we’ve had any vandals around here, I’m just prepared in case that were to ever happen.

        Most lighting control, even smart light switches too smart lights, is handled through a hub of sorts; I have home assistant, but it’s not necessarily the best for everyone. When a light switch is pressed, no power delivery changes, it just sends a command to HA to command the lights to turn on. The lights are powered 24/7, so we can turn on the lights with our phones. Most of the light switches have little more than basic controls of on/off for the respective group of lightbulbs. Any color control is either programmed or configured from the app.

        A small number of bulbs are still in Phillips hue, and when I have the money those will be taken out because Phillips stuff is expensive for what you get. Easy to get into, but extremely limiting and the output sucks compared to alternatives.

        My home is mostly zwave for the exact reason you mentioned. I don’t want my wifi to suck because my fridge needs to be online 24/7. Not that I have, or would ever own a “smart” fridge… I just know the technology and putting some 50+ lightbulbs and light switches on wifi would generally make the wifi terrible. I picked zwave because it operates mainly on the 900mhz ISM band, well away from the 2.4/5ghz of wifi.

        I get why so many use Wi-Fi, but I hate that. Just make it a module that you can plug in. Then give people a choice of wifi, Ethernet, ZigBee, zwave, matter/thread, or nothing. FFS.

        Anyways. Thanks for coming to my Ted talk, I guess?

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m sure oral-b isn’t far behind on that one. They’ve been making smart electric toothbrushes for a while.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          the higher end ones use AI/smart tech. i have the lower end one which is basically no different just without all the shitty techa nd less expensive. sonicare is another one, i bought an offbrand one that comes with 6 brusheads and a electronically , you can set your brush settings custome settings.

          the higher ends are quite expensive, and you look at the review they suffer more failures/useless than the “lower endones”