• ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    about 70 models currently on US roads sporting electric handles

    So you can be mad at Tesla for making this popular but it’s clearly not a Tesla specific problem anymore.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Recently there was a similar incident in China involving a Xiaomi car. This led to an incoming legislation that will require all cars to have mechanical handles in case of emergency.

    Tesla alone had many such cases and there are no plans whatsoever to do anything about it.

    Imagine losing to China in safety regulations.

  • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    18 hours ago

    When I was young and naïve in my 50s, I thought US cars had safety requirements, and the era of rolling death traps had been beaten back by Ralph Nader. Must’ve been my mistake. Is there nobody in the government looking at safety issues like un-openable doors?

    • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Shut it libtard, “safety” is a made-up democrat hoax. Don’t wear your seatbelt, die like a real man.

      I feel it is probably necessary to add /s

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        My grandfather 40 years ago rolled his Bronco II into a ditch while drinking and driving. I honestly believe he’d lived if he wore his seat belt. The accident ejected him and broke his neck…ending his life.

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Is there nobody in the government looking at safety issues like un-openable doors?

      Really? Are you actually surprised? The man who decided to put electric un-openable doors onto is the same man who took a chainsaw to the federal regulatory budget and got rid of any agency that had the the authority to rule on such an issue.

      To repeat:

      Is there nobody in the government looking at safety issues like un-openable doors?

      Nope, Elon Musk fired the people who were responsible for making his cars safe because Elon thought their recommendations cost too much and your safety is a sacrifice Elon Musk is willing to make if it makes Tesla stock value increase.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There is regulation. Tesla is just the first company to make a separate emergency handle. Other companies managed to figure out how to do it with one handle. Even with frameless doors.

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Corvettes, going back to at least the C6 generation (2005ish) have electronic handles, but they have mechanical emergency pulls on the floor next to the door sill. Yes, messing with them will set off the car alarm if the doors are locked. Ask me how I know.

        I have no idea why anyone where it freezes would want mechanical handles, especially ones that electronically self-present. I’ve had to yeet my frozen shit door open on more than occasion.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Regulation is bad. Anything that restricts multimillion donor billionaires’ wise ways of doing business is literally communism. Or was it Fascism.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        communism. Or was it Fascism.

        depends on which party is in charge and who you ask about it.

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      For real. Mechanical handle hidden under the rubber cupholder is wild. As a European I’m amazed that it’s legal.

      • lemming741@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I hate that others have jumped on the door handle trends. It’s like apple being “brave enough” to remove the headphone port. My car at least has the electric switch and mechanical backup on the same handle. I don’t love it, but you can’t get trapped inside.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t see how prospective car buyers can see shit like that and not see it as indicative of much larger design issues lurking under the hood.

        Like, how do you see that and not immediately question the safety concerns of adding additional steps to escape the vehicle if there is an accident and the electric door loses power? How do you from there not question what other poor design decisions may have been made if something so obvious got through? Do people just not think about the things they’re spending 10s of thousands of dollars on?

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I think that most people just don’t think about such details. Personally I wouldn’t. I’d think about the ergonomics of the unlock mechanism when it works as intended, which sucks, by the way.

          But I wouldn’t really think about safety. It’s not my job. I would assume the industrial designer did their job, and that the regulator did theirs.

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          16 hours ago

          A lot of prospective car buyers like the thing based on the few details they interact with during a test drive and don’t think any further ahead, just like with everything else in their lives.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Someone else posted a photo. It appears to be an obvious lever, not hidden under the cupholder.

  • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The Euro NCAP crash test scoring was just revised so that cars that don’t have manual controls for the most important functionality cannot get 5 star ratings anymore.

    • BlindFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I don’t understand electronic parking brakes.

      Having a big “Please Don’t Move Unless Released” lever is very important to me, and I mean this earnestly.

    • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      19 hours ago

      There is a manual override in Teslas too. It’s just so well hidden that you’re not going to find in an emergency.

      • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Manual overrides won’t count.

        It turns out people don’t have time to read manuals and find hidden options in emergencies.

        • socsa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          I feel like when operating a lethal hunk of metal at such speeds, perhaps it should be a requirement to RTFM. For several reasons.

          • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Up until about 15 years ago any person who knew how to drive any random car would have been able to operate about 99% of all cars in existence safely without ever looking at a fucking manual.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Should be marked so it’s obvious, but I remember a post about a guy who astonished people by knowing so much. His method? Reading the manual.

          • scintilla@crust.piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            14 hours ago

            You shouldn’t have to read the manual to not fucking die in a car fire. This isn’t like some secret mode to let you change what noise the horn makes. This has literally killed people.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I agree, but seeing pictures of the lever, how do people not look around their car and see what levers and buttons do what?

              Anyway my story about the manual was just meant as a story about the manual.

              • FrederikNJS@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                11 hours ago

                The rear doors in Teslas don’t have any lever to manually release the door. You actually have to take off a piece of trim or the side pocket liner to find a wireloop that you have to pull.

                The rear passengers in the tesla are rarely the owner of the tesla, which means that they also likely doesn’t know how to access the manual release… Why this hasn’t caused a worldwide recall is a mystery to me.

                • Anivia@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  And if you sit in the rear of a Model X good luck opening the doors even with a manual release

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      One would think the crash tests would automatically produce results that would disqualify vehicles from a 5-star rating. Why would you need an amendment to the rules if crashes were disabling door locks and rendering doors inoperable? That seems like an automatic strike against safety.

      • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Because the door handles are not always disabled in a crash. There’s technically a system in place to extend the handles if a crash is detected, which works the majority of the time. The issue is that, clearly, this system is not reliable enough (because, ya know, if the control system gets wrecked in a crash, it cant extend the handles). But my guess is that it still works enough in crash tests to not automatically disqualify it from 5-stars.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    “It’s terrifying,” said Kevin Clouse, a Georgia resident who was trapped in his Model 3 following a 2023 crash and had to kick out a window to escape. He recently filed a complaintwith US regulators and has sought to raise awareness of door-related entrapment on social media. “You’re in a box that’s on fire and you can’t get out.”

    What a horrifying way to go.

    • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      trapped in his Model 3

      If it was his model 3 then that implies he was driving. Did he try the mechanical door release and it didn’t work or did he not know about it because Tesla stupidly made it invisible?

        • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          They’re more/less in the place you would expect them to be but they’re blended in with the rest of the door. You have to pull up on the thing in front of the window button.

            • socsa@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Yes, and they are so conspicuous, about 90% of passengers use them instead of the button until briefed otherwise.

            • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Only in the front, unfortunately. Somehow there are way too many Tesla owners who don’t know about them. The back seat is another story. There IS a mechanical release under the rubber liner in the door pocket. You have to pull the liner out and pull on a steel cable to open it. Some people have cut holed in the liner and added little handles to get around this put it’s still a huge oversight by Tesla IMO.

          • someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            That’s the actual lever? In that case that’s uh actually pretty obvious.

            • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              14 hours ago

              In that case that’s uh actually pretty obvious.

              Really? Because I have 15 people who burned to death because it isn’t.

              That’s not where people look for door handles. It’s not marked. It doesn’t stand out in any way. It’s obvious only if you already know it’s there. Otherwise it’s a death trap.

            • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I thought so too. Slightly less obvious for the driver side. See my other comment about the back seat though.

                • greybeard@feddit.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  On that side it isn’t obvious at all. It blend in with the window buttons and looks like it is just a plastic panel. A design flourish or convenience, not a functional lever.

                • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 hours ago

                  Yeah… Some people really are not observant and car manufacturers need to cater to those people as well.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Can someone explain what was wrong with normal door handles that they would do this?

    Is it like some Steve Jobs-esque obsession with a car not being a car or something?

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      My understanding is that it’s related to the frameless glass on the doors, it needs to roll the windows down a smidgen to clear the water seal on the door frame, so you press the button which tells the computer to roll the window down a couple of mm then actuate the door.

      • cmfhsu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        Every coupe has had this feature for 40 years, before they had electric windows, even. You just dip the window as the door latch actuates, whether the window is electrically or mechanically hooked to the door handle.

        I have one of those cars in my garage with a fully mechanical door handle, with a mechanical lock for the key and everything.

    • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They think the extra .01 “mpg” gained from smooth doors is worth the risk. I think most people would agree that it’s not.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s actually dumber. I’m pretty sure this just got removed because mechanical door handles don’t look or sound as cool as electronic door handles.

        One must remember that Elon Musk is perpetually trapped at 11 years old.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It’s not necessary to have electric door handles for that. Aircraft have been using purely mechanical handles where one side is pushed to make the other stand out enough to pull for decades. Several flush door handle designs requiring no electronics have appeared on cars as well.

    • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      As another commenter pointed out it does have a noticeable impact on mpg, however you can still do flush mounted handles that are fully manual. Basically every other car manufacturer does manual locks except for Tesla and a couple small (less than 10,000 units annually) companies. The thing is electric locks are cheaper, and when you don’t care about safety, you go for the cheapest option.

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The real issue is that they can’t be opened from the inside. Unless you locate the mechanical latch, which involves peeling off the rubber lining of the cupholder.

  • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I have similar style of handles on my car that the model 3, S, and Y have. The thing is the manufacturer made the handle manual while still being flush with the body, they even added a physical key hole so I can have access to the interior if the battery is dead, while still being flush with the body. It’s not hard to do manual, it’s safer, it just costs slightly more, and as we’ve seen in capitalism, lives are cheap. So what if it kills someone, you saved $5.

    • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Is there some evidence that the electric handles are cheaper? You still need all of the same mechanical latches and linkages, but now add electric actuators and wiring. Intuitively it doesn’t seem like it would be cheaper to me.

      • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Electric door handles don’t need all the linkages, it’s literally a solenoid that’s attached directly to the latch and that solenoid is both the door latch and the door lock. There’s only 2 moving parts, the solenoid and the latch itself. The model 3, S, X and Y have an additional moving part that is the actual handle that triggers the solenoid, but the cybertruck doesn’t even have that.

        My manual door handle has the outside handle, the lock, the inside handle, the electronic lock, the linkages between the lock and the outside handle, the linkages between the lock and the inside handle, the linkages between the lock and the latch, then the latch. There’s way more machining and assembly involved in a manual lock and door handle than an electronic lock, and that machining has to be way more precise.

        • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          That’s valid. I guess that by “so the mechanical linkages” etc. I was thinking of what actually holds the door shut securely in the vehicle frame. You still need a mechanical override for the solenoid actuator, but I can see that being cheaper overall after reading your description.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No, because nothing matters except stock price.

      Musk’s companies aren’t evaluated based on their ability to sell products/services, they’re valued on hype.

      If he left any of his companies they would suffer drastic stock crashes which would likely kill the company.

      Oddly enough Silicon Valley does a really good job of explaining how wonky the math gets.

      “Normal” companies try to raise stock by making a product, these tech companies are basically exploiting glitch’s in the stock market. It’s why everyone else is losing.

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    There are layers to this.

    No exterior door handles is a massive danger in the event of a crash that incapacitates those inside. No interoir door handles is a massive danger to those inside in the event of a crash that takes out the electrical system.

    That said. Plenty of crashes will “disable” the doors just from the type of impact and so forth. And those tend to be the really bad ones.

    Which is why EVERYONE should have, preferably a pair, of those car window breakers. Keep one handy to the driver and one either in the box between the driver and passenger or somewhere very visible in the back seat area.

    In the event of a really bad crash? That is how you cut your seatbelt if it is jammed or you are otherwise unable to easily access it. And that is how you smash the glass to get out. And if you pull up to the side of an accident? That is how you get the injured driver out (keeping in mind all safety related concerns with moving someone who might have a spinal injury).

    Just… also be aware that it has become increasingly popular (and not just among swasticars) to laminate many of the occupant windows. This DOES prevent shards of glass from flying into your face in the event a pickup truck tried to run you over. This ALSO makes escape a LOT harder. It is good to actually read your manual (or at least the labels on the windows) to know which ones you can escape from in the event of a crash.

    But yeah., There is no fucking reason to remove mechanical door handles. But it is not THAT much of a danger in the event of a crash. Whereas it IS very much a deeply annoying hazard in the event of accidentally starting a firmware update with the door closed…

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      15 deaths directly as a result of doors failing to unlock, not because the door was smashed but because of electronic failure, is not THAT much of a danger?

      Some of these incidents aren’t even crashes. It’s just battery malfunction, causing a fire and trapping the passengers.

      And for nothing. Teslas do have a mechanical emergency release latch. It’s just hidden.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        People vastly underestimate the importance of having a window breaking tool. Many people who die when they go into a lake could very much be alive if they had just unbuckled, smashed, and swam/floated away. One of the best Mythbusters episodes was about specifically this. Opening a door when you are underwater but there is still air in the cabin is REALLY REALLY hard and the vast majority of people do not have the training/calm to take a last gasp of air, wait for pressure to equalize, and get going.

        Same with burning vehicles. People very much underestimate how rapidly it is just not possible for all but the most adrenaline filled of mothers to get into that car to pull out someone who is unconscious or panicking because they can’t get their seatbelt off.

        People who can’t get out of a burning vehicle because the electrical system has failed catastrophically but there is no meaningful damage to the doors is not nothing. But… 15 people IS nothing. Especially when you realize they might fall under a different category as well.

        As per https://www.nfpa.org/education-and-research/research/nfpa-research/fire-statistical-reports/vehicle-fires the NFPA estimated an annual of 215k vehicle fires in the US during the 2018-2022 timeframe with 643 deaths per year (I think. Kinda ambiguous). Assuming those deaths were within a single calendar year (too lazy to find an archive link or see if reader mode works), that is 2%. If it is spread out, that is even less.

        The swasticar doors are fundamentally stupid and dangerous and have no reason to exist. But in terms of ways to prevent loss of life? They are REALLY low on the totem pole.

        Whereas normalizing both drivers and good samaritans having tools to actually get into a car goes a long way. Because maybe that fire is because of the battery and the entire car is intact otherwise. More often you rae dealing with a jammed door because they got t-boned or rolled in a bad way. And the answer in both cases is to smashy-smashy.


        A good way to think of it (that will remind us this is still essentially reddit and people hate metaphors) is like if Toyota decided every single car needed a dorsal fin… made out of sharpened steel. Yes, someone would inevitably get killed by it and that would lead to statistics. But it would have no meaningful impact on the lethality of a vehicle because so much else about cars is already so insanely dangerous.

        But also… why the fuck would you duct tape a sword to a car? Don’t fucking do that.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Alright, you’ve convinced me that a window breaking tool in the glove box might not be the worst idea. Got any recommendations for good ones or is this just a generic item?

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Check wirecutter or even amazon. Tempered glass is actually ridiculously easy to break even with just a spark plug in your hand, so anything with a hammer shape and the right tip is gonna do it. Just make sure there is also a seatbelt cutter on the tool.

            That said, it is probably worth spending some more money to get the spring loaded type. It doesn’t take THAT much effort to smash a tempered glass window, but it is a lot easier to just push a device against it instead.

    • Albbi@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yikes! I better buy a bigger vehicle so that if I’m in a crash, I won’t be the one getting crushed! /s

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I passionately hate the door handles on Teslas they are too perfect of a symbol of useless empty technological development that Tesla embodies. I can’t swallow the firehose of poetic synchronicity it is too intense for me to be in close proximity to, my bitter sarcasm starts going haywire like a geiger counter near radioactive waste. Tesla door handles are affront to basic engineering principles and it terrifies me that the same guy who demanded them is allowed to own a company that sends humans to space.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’ve encountered electronic door poppers on a few rental cars and I’ve always disliked them. I see no advantage at all, and several more things to go wrong.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, like I’ve seen mechanical door handles break but it’s always been on really old vehicles (except one that was a POS chevy aveo someone I knew had). Electronic shit just introduces problems and doesn’t add anything.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’ve broken and repaired a couple. They’re easy to diagnose, and the parts are cheap. Perhaps more importantly for safety, their failure modes are not triggered by crashing.