I just once want techbros to explain what getting “left behind” would look like? Oh, will I not have as much practice sweet talking the robot compared to you? Gosh, it’ll be soooo hard to catch up…
Surely their jobs as essentially LLM middlemen are rock solid and in no danger of being disrupted in this future they imagine for themselves where all the dummies who questioned why we are scrambling to adopt nascent technology to replace every facet of our lives, got left behind. Whatever that means…
More importantly what does not getting left behind look like? Nobody actually cares that somebody can use AI to code something or to write a press release. If you’re not somebody who was already deemed socially important in the offline world, you’ll probably get left behind anyway.
I just got an email from a recruiter who works for “the #1 professional vibe coding tool”
Who’s he calling a tool?!?
Edit: oh wait, I misread lol
Ew, I’m not a vibe coding tool. I’m just a tool who codes.
If you drink enough caffeine you’ll start vibing, don’t worry
Buzz buzz, baby
fartographer
Name checks out
I went to a prison that had a high number of pedophiles. They would often make comments like this to try and portray themselves as normal.
isnt it interesting how everyone has a hierarchy/gatekeeping.
for example, pedophiles like epstein were disgusted with pedophiles like trump. because epstein apparently had a rule about them atleast having had their first period, but trump had no such restrictions
whattt…
Trump must have wanted to avoid having to kill and dump more of his race victims’ newborns.
deleted by creator
good thing theres no inappropriate content on the internet he is using… dipshit
It’s more like “Get on the train or you’ll be left to die.”.
I really don’t understand how these awful comebacks get popular
Having a sense of humor helps.
Really I was just hoping for better, something of quality
Only the most rarefied of humorous material will do, perhaps something from Tibet?
It’s only humor if it comes from the Humorous region of France. Otherwise, it’s just sparkling comedy.
Maybe something funny, perhaps even with some wit, I should hope this isn’t rare
The internet isn’t the place for that.
It’s simple.
AI is bad, so all lines of reasoning that conclude with AI being bad must be correct lines of reasoning.
Weird they’re on the internet, given all the child pornography on there. Clearly CP isn’t what keeps them off a train.
It’s fine that the chemical plant by my house is dumping carcinogens in the river because the river was already full of garbage anyway!
What a braindead take.
I already said that I didn’t realise the comm I was in:
My apologies, didn’t realise the comm I’m in. You are correct. All GenAI users consume child porn. All lemmyNSFW users whine about CSAM being a problem anywhere. There is no CSAM on the internet, you are not on a CSAM train as the post would imply.
You peeps have fun.
You’re absolutely correct, the person you quoted is very silly for saying those words. You masterfully dismantled that quote. I’m sure whoever said it is feeling very foolish.
I didn’t say anything was good, “fine”, or bad. The post says using a tool used for CSAM is bad, and the tool used to say it is one used for CSAM. I pointed out the hypocrisy of the poster.
I know, I know: the comm. What did I expect? I’m sorry, I should have looked first.
deleted by creator
Don’t do that. This isn’t a witch hunt. Calling out the garbage that is generated content? Great, everyone should. Pointing out the pressing issue of the tech being used to sexualize individuals and minors online? Fantastic!
But calling all users of the tech pedophiles? That’s just gross, and is a shitty scare mongering tactic - a sad, empty attempt to make people too afraid to argue back. There are already plenty of real issues with llms and the like. Fabricating made up ones devalues your own words and the words of everyone else that speaks up.
It’s not a witch-hunt when the witch is publicly saying csam isn’t a problem, it’s just calling a spade a spade.
No, it’s not. You’re both just using the word as a cudgel, as a weapon to scare others and pretend you’re righteous and beyond any further debate. It’s an insult to public discourse and to anyone who spends time arguing the actual issues with this tech.
deleted by creator
Yeah, you don’t get to split-hairs here. A “microscopic sliver” is functionally none. And if that’s not what you meant to say, then you shouldn’t have said it. Painting entire groups of people you disagree with as pedophiles is not something to be done lightly, or at all really.
deleted by creator

I can’t punch an argument dummy
My apologies, didn’t realise the comm I’m in. You are correct. All GenAI users consume child porn. All lemmyNSFW users whine about CSAM being a problem anywhere. There is no CSAM on the internet, you are not on a CSAM train as the post would imply.
You peeps have fun.
Kinda came to say this. I’m all for having fun bashing AI, but we’re literally on the internet of which also has CP on it.















