• renzev@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 month ago

    Figure out a system to prevent overuse

    If we’re going down the “government should pay for it” route, then a good solution would be subsidizing thermal insulation. It’s a big investment upfront, but will save a lot of money for both homeowners and the government in the future. Not to mention the obvious ecological benefits.

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Absolutely. We should be subsidizing anything and everything that helps decrease energy usage, especially in ways that mean we don’t have to make big changes to lifestyle. Though that’s a whole other discussion. :/ But utilities in general, electricity, water, Internet, gas (though if possible move that shit to electric) should be public and no cost at the point of use, imho

    • Emi@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That would require them to think long term and logically , Also i assume lots of companies would not like that they won’t be able to get as much profit.

      Don’t get me wrong I definitely agree but there’s just so much things that would work better, be cheaper more efficient and better for the environment but that would cost money and not make much profit. Sometimes I have hope people will get fed up with this BS and change happens but mostly I’m skeptical.