• dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Okay, since its obviously hyperbole that it isnt possible, its a potential outcome so lets return to my original question (deemed a massive assumption on my part by you):

      once it no longer needs massive amounts of expensive resources, what then?

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        So copypasting your question does what…? If you can’t be bothered to think through my answer and think of a different question, then go re-read the answer I already gave you.

        • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          48 minutes ago

          Okay, its called a hypothetical, which you ignored. I therefore ignored your bad faith attempt at diverting the discussion at hand. Hypothetically, what happens when it is energy efficient? Its not impossible. I am only saying, sure do whatever you gotta do to regulate ai now, but it will eventually get there, and then what?

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            45 minutes ago

            Then, hyperbolically, and hypothetically, the entire electronic and computing world is massively changed and not just AI. Because such a change wouldn’t be limited to AI’s use. I wish you wouldn’t keep playing with the conditions of the argument myopically in an attempt to be right. If you don’t like someone criticizing hyperbole and hypotheticals, don’t use them.