The irony of you calling it an ID-ten-T error, located between peripheral and chair, while you vehemently defend the use of AI tp study a subject. You’re truly irredeemable.
I am, again, not misunderstanding you, idk how you could possibly construe that. You’re a filthy slopper. It’s garbage for searching as it will inevitably misinform people with its hallucinations unlike an actual search engine.
Being misinformed by it is, as I said, a user issue. But the amount of times that googling for half an hour did not get me an inch closer to the solution and then I asked chatgpt and it just lists me a bunch of ideas one of which inevitably sets me off on the right path (sometimes it’s even completely right in its solution, but that’s more 50/50) is greater than 2. It’s a tool that has its uses. Claiming it doesn’t because most people are too skill issued to use it as such doesn’t change the narrow but very useful use case these things have. Far too narrow to sustain this bubble, but that shouldn’t be news for anyone here.
There’s an insane degree of irony in calling me a slopper or whatever while you’re displaying a fundamental unwillingness to critically engage
The irony of you calling it an ID-ten-T error, located between peripheral and chair, while you vehemently defend the use of AI tp study a subject. You’re truly irredeemable.
You are again misunderstanding what they are saying. they clearly said it had use as a search engine, not research in any academic sense.
I am, again, not misunderstanding you, idk how you could possibly construe that. You’re a filthy slopper. It’s garbage for searching as it will inevitably misinform people with its hallucinations unlike an actual search engine.
Being misinformed by it is, as I said, a user issue. But the amount of times that googling for half an hour did not get me an inch closer to the solution and then I asked chatgpt and it just lists me a bunch of ideas one of which inevitably sets me off on the right path (sometimes it’s even completely right in its solution, but that’s more 50/50) is greater than 2. It’s a tool that has its uses. Claiming it doesn’t because most people are too skill issued to use it as such doesn’t change the narrow but very useful use case these things have. Far too narrow to sustain this bubble, but that shouldn’t be news for anyone here.
There’s an insane degree of irony in calling me a slopper or whatever while you’re displaying a fundamental unwillingness to critically engage
This is the core of my disagreement with you worthless AI Techbro Sloppers.