Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day ago"Can I open those for you, ma'am?"lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square114linkfedilinkarrow-up1566arrow-down110
arrow-up1556arrow-down1image"Can I open those for you, ma'am?"lemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square114linkfedilink
minus-squareBrkdncr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·1 day agoIf there was no charge then everyone would bring their own, and they would have to start charging more for the food to make up for the loss.
minus-squareKangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 day agoWhat loss? They can lose something that they didn’t had in the first place.
minus-squareBrkdncr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 day agoLike it or not, alcohol sales subsidize their income. The markup is substantial.
minus-squareKangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 day agoAnd that still doesn’t justifies the literal extortion of their clients.
minus-squareFishFace@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·22 hours agoMate, it’s not extortion because you have the option of not doing it. Look up extortion in a dictionary. Then if you still think it’s wrong, work out why you actually object to it.
If there was no charge then everyone would bring their own, and they would have to start charging more for the food to make up for the loss.
not if they just say no.
What loss? They can lose something that they didn’t had in the first place.
Like it or not, alcohol sales subsidize their income. The markup is substantial.
And that still doesn’t justifies the literal extortion of their clients.
Yes it does?
Mate, it’s not extortion because you have the option of not doing it. Look up extortion in a dictionary.
Then if you still think it’s wrong, work out why you actually object to it.