• Loce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    True in a way, but it was more philosophical and not “in your face”. It made you think about it, and the story was way waay better and deeper than today’s pew-pew starwars approach to star trek. Every episode had a meaning and a lession.

    • Hugin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah the problem isn’t the ideals being in there but how bad the story is makes the ideals seem like a cheap crutch.

      Compare Brokeback Mountain to Ben and Arthur. Both movies about the relationship between gay men and society. Both say gay people should be treated fairly by socity but aren’t. The first does it in interesting way with great storytelling and ideas. The later is a hamfisted mess.

      I’m not going to say modern Trek is Ben and Arthur bad but it is much closer to Ben and Arthur writing then it is to Brokeback Mountain.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      True in a way, but it was more philosophical and not “in your face”.

      they did the first US interracial kiss during a time that would be controversial.

      it was “in your face”

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It was much better integrated into the story. The problem isn’t the message, it’s the writing.