octopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoFacepalm on multiple levelslemmy.mlimagemessage-square130linkfedilinkarrow-up1976arrow-down112cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1964arrow-down1imageFacepalm on multiple levelslemmy.mloctopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square130linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareoctopus_ink@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·1 year agoI think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
minus-squareCyrus Draegur@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·1 year agoExactly. “they can’t do that that’s illegal” Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES
I think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
Exactly.
“they can’t do that that’s illegal”
Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES